Today on YT - Anna Brees, Tim from Salisbury in his video suggested an armband, to identify those of us who are AWAKE and onto them! Tim suggested Black, I thought purple, however on thinking it through . why not use RED, the KBF colour. Any piece of red fabric could be used, it would identify those of use who question this crisis. Thoughts? I hope Simon will clock this message.
Not sure about that. What instantly sprang to mind was....didn't the Nazis wear armbands?
My original idea was purple as its a sovereign colour and we are sovereign beings
Armband is a great idea . Purple arm band is fine . It will give comfort to those that feel scared out and about and bring us together . Purple ..
How about wearing a yellow star? 😉🤡
We don't need to identify ourselves to anyone. This is partly why we are here is it not?
Not wearing a muzzle and not standing two meters apart is enough, no? You can also tell by the lack of fear in peoples eyes as to whether they are awake (alive?) or not
I agree with you, Chris.
Imagine the campaign of hatred the legacy media and the likes of 77th Brigade would mount against a small easily identifiable enemy.
Why would you want to mark yourself out for potential abuse?
@clownworld the 'low hanging fruit' 'troll' Yep. 77 brigade are already here on this site....i'll just leave that hanging!
We, the real sovereign entities, need to behave as normal and ignore any contracts offered to us with grace and honour. We are not the different ones so do not need to mark ourselves out.
Totally agree with you Chris
I think an armband is a great idea......purple is a good colour, probably better than black because some people would just assume you're mourning the loss of someone, rather than mourning the loss of the whole human race.
In order to tie it in with the idea of a hashtag, I just Googled #purplearmband, but it already exists to counter violence against women. I really like the idea of a 'blood-red' armband, so thought, what about a sanguine armband and it is perfect. Sanguine has a few definitions including:
1. optimistic or positive, especially in an apparently bad or difficult situation. "he is sanguine about prospects for the global economy"
2. (in medieval science and medicine) of or having the constitution associated with the predominance of blood among the bodily humours, supposedly marked by a ruddy complexion and an optimistic disposition.
3.(archaic) bloody or bloodthirsty.
4. noun: sanguine a blood-red colour.
I was thinking a hashtag of #sanguinearmband might fit the bill, but armband is a bit 'lame' next to sanguine......then I thought of 'tourniquet:
tourniquet /ˈtʊənɪkeɪ,ˈtɔːnɪkeɪ/ noun noun: tourniquet; plural noun: tourniquets
1. a device for stopping the flow of blood through a vein or artery, typically by compressing a limb with a cord or tight bandage.
Put them together:
#sanguinetourniquet
So I've done it...I think I've created my first ever tweet. If people do twitter, search it out and pass it on.
Al
Nazi armband, Jewish star. Taking the knee for BLM Etc No, this is completely the wrong approach in my opinion it is segregating us more, we will be on the same wave as the mask wearers!
TJC.....How is a red armband a Nazi Armband? And if you're saying it is, are you equating a Nazi armband with a Jewish Star? Wasn't one chosen 'voluntarily' and one by force? How can they be the same thing? I don't see it as segregating. I see it as offering an alternative to masks. When someone is only receiving their view of the world through the BBC, then anything that makes them think is a good thing. Couldn't you say that about any insignia....the 'rainbow' stuff, a 'Keep Britain Free' t-shirt or cap....are you saying we shouldn't 'advertise' our cause?
Confused.
Hi Alan. If I may interject; I see both sides of this. I think football shirts says it all. This is my team and that's your team. It only makes people dig in to their side of the fence. I believe that talking about jewish stars or nazi insignia kind of loses the focus.
We need to behave like rational and honourable human beings in any way we can. It is my understanding that to do so is that we are, I hate to say it, inclusive (!) of any one that realises that they have been sold a pup with this C-19. The very fact that we don't wear a mask when asked to do so, we challenge the narrative and we congregate here is enough, no?
Which leads to the question - why do we need to identify ourselves in any way?
Masks, as important an issue as it is, is a side issue which will run on and on, (as it has for 4 months) whilst the infrastructure to take away more of our freedoms is being set up in this and 15 other countries - whilst we debate https://www.keepbritainfree.com/forum/activism/if-we-all-did-this-1-thing-now-we-could-prevent-even-more-of-our-freedoms-from-being-taken-away
I was going to second Tim's armband idea but upon reflection and reeading these comments I have changed my mind. We don't want to single ourselves out for abuse, life is hard enough without that. If you see someone not wearing a mask then you know that they are probably on your wavelength. Just smile and maybe talk to them.
Exactly. Stay human, courteous and maintain dignity ( which means you probably don’t wear a muzzle, gloves, or anything else that takes away your humanity). That is by far enough to show which side of the fence your views are on