Common sense that you only need to quarantine if you are I'll with symptoms and healthy people with no illness don't need to do this. One of the justifications used for draconian lockdowns is there is a danger asymptomatic people can carry the disease. I have wondered if this is true because the idea of asymptomatic carriers is a convenient tool for lockdown zealots and if this idea didn't exist the current narrative would be difficult to sustain. Does anyone feel asymptomatic carriers is a myth. If this idea didn't exist governments would have the following issues -
1) It would be much harder to frighten people as asymptomatic people would not worry they may be carrying a disease or other asymptomatic people could spread the disease to them. If the idea of asymptomatic carriers exist people will worry they could carry the disease and anyone could spread the disease to them regardless of whether they show symptoms.
2) It would be impossible to justify draconian lockdowns where everyone is placed under quarantine even if they are healthy and show no symptoms.
3) It would not be possible to tell people they should social distance and not gather in groups etc if asymptomatic people have no fear of spreading the disease.
Maybe a thought experiment here:- A person goes to the doctor and says he thinks he's got Martins disease, so the doctor asks 'what symptoms are you feeling?', person replies 'none that I'm aware of, I actually feel fine'. Doctor says, so what makes you think you have Martins disease then? Person replies, well there's a lot of it about so I figured I've probably caught it somewhere along the way'. Doctor replies, 'if you don't have symptoms, and you feel well, then you almost certainly don't have Martins disease- can you send the next patient in on your way out please'. That would be a crazy scenario, none of us would go to the doctor saying we think we may have this virus or that illness unless we were showing symptoms, and because the PCR test detects DNA from any coronavirus and even possibly human DNA, for me asymptomatic spread is a manufactured myth.
And the other nonsense of course is that "people don't seem to be getting immununity to this virus!". They really have covered all the bases to ensnare everyone. When you step back, put aside the fear mongering propoganda, you will see that the emperor has no clothes.
When you consider that the test isn't for Covid, it's for a DNA marker and the designer of the test said it should not be used to diagnose COVID 19. Do you think that 80 % of those who test positive are asymptotic? Or is it more likely the test is wrong and they don't have the virus?
Of course it is an absolute nonsense. It is a made up limitless virus where they can choose any tangent they wish to go off on. The asymptomatic means all areas are covered. The cunning of these bastards is quite staggering. The gullibility of the scared masses even more so.