Since the entire basis for justifying all the lockdowns is the RT-PCR test, I am not alone in thinking this one of their achilles heels that needs constant attacking.
I have written to Public Health England asking them what each of their laboratories use as a cycle threshold value.
I watched a video broadcast recently that featured Dr. Anthony Fauci, a leading member of the White House's Coronavirus Task Force, discussing the reliability of the RT-PCR test being used to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 cases.
This is a link to the video.
In this video one of the hosts is asking Dr. Fauci if there is a RT-PCR Ct value that can be used as a means of identifying someone as infectious or not. In response Dr. Fauci states the following:
"If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-confident are miniscule…you almost never can culture a virus from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…".
He states this is evolving into a 'kinda' standard. An interesting choice of words. It made me wonder what Ct PHE and the NHS laboratories across the UK are using.
So I opened up a FOI here.
Please read it, in particular the 'scientific' paper referred to which I believe is where Fauci (and he appears not to have understood it), gets his 'golden standard' of 35 Ct.
Well Drosten should be getting a little worried. A group of scientists have reviewed his test (PHE base their protocol on it) and it isn't pretty.
Worth circulating. Clearly even the use of primers etc have been designed to pick up as many false positives as possible.
I thought Fauci was America's bad guy? same old wriggling to suit his plans.
They need prosecuting. There is an action being started in Germany to prosecute the heads of the Deutsche Bahn, the Deutsche Bank etc for forcing their employees to wear masks in contravention of health and safety laws. I'll post some updates here.
I agree I started a post similar. Plus there’s other. All have a lot of info. We need a list of school heads etc to send it all to - they need educating