Since the entire basis for justifying all the lockdowns is the RT-PCR test, I am not alone in thinking this one of their achilles heels that needs constant attacking. I have written to Public Health England asking them what each of their laboratories use as a cycle threshold value. I watched a video broadcast recently that featured Dr. Anthony Fauci, a leading member of the White House's Coronavirus Task Force, discussing the reliability of the RT-PCR test being used to diagnose SARS-CoV-2 cases. This is a link to the video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a_Vy6fgaBPE&feature=youtu.be&t=260 In this video one of the hosts is asking Dr. Fauci if there is a RT-PCR Ct value that can be used as a means of identifying someone as infectious or not. In response Dr. Fauci states the following: "If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more…the chances of it being replication-confident are miniscule…you almost never can culture a virus from a 37 threshold cycle…even 36…". He states this is evolving into a 'kinda' standard. An interesting choice of words. It made me wonder what Ct PHE and the NHS laboratories across the UK are using. So I opened up a FOI here. https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/calibration_of_rt_pcr_test_to_es Please read it, in particular the 'scientific' paper referred to which I believe is where Fauci (and he appears not to have understood it), gets his 'golden standard' of 35 Ct.