After gaining a response from the CPS suggesting they will only consider Gross Negligence Manslaughter against the UK Government after police investigation, my next stage has been to send FoI to the Home Office to ascertain the highest police authority to contact for this criminal investigation, rather than being messed around by some low level useful idiot.
What we need to be doing is gathering all evidence of criminal activity, with specific target toward instructions at any level to deny healthcare resulting in fatality, instruction to force the Liverpool programme unjustifiably, any fatality as a result of their so-called vaccine, whereby it must not be forgotten that the The Nuremberg Code (1947) still applies, or any other matter of direct instruction that has resulted in fatality.
I will be putting together the wider pseudoscience they are claiming to push this crap as support, but any additional direct evidence is welcome.
This method is required on account of the fact that this is criminal, and because it is clear that the judicial system prevents any civil action. There will be more actions, but these tyrants need to be hit from every side and though I have seen on this forum suggestions of raising funds for criminal action and hiring a QC, that would still be civil, and not criminal. I want to push for criminal.
Anyone with evidence, feel free to send it to paulbuckingham@protonmail.com
Personally I think you are right, they are the useful idiots (thugs) and is not my intention to dissappoint you but I don't think we will get any where with the police. This is the biggest fraud taking place in history and genocide. If the police are only going for gross negligence and manslaughter it is obvious that it will be a case designed to fail. This is because we are not going to be able to enumerate all fatalities (and they know that) if any, when all news are censured. The same with vaccine adversed events, they are not published. No even the unemployment official figures are available (published) or the number of small businesses obligued to close down by now. On the other the police has been one of the biggest colaboraters of all fatalities taken place, reason why they are limiting the case they will consider.
Yes, we don't need a QC for a private crriminal prosecution, we could even do it ourselves without a solicitor. But probably find a team of solicitors will be more realistic.
A few things here: a) in terms of process this is a single part of a multiple target to ensure all bases are covered.
b) Gross Negligence Manslaughter is the highest potential route available, and when combined with the Nuremberg Code (1947) the intention here is to intimidate straight back via a route that avoids the already failed civil attempts.
c) This is in conjunction with other FoI responses already gained, which assist the case of negligence.
d) Data is being gathered from whistleblowers of direct instruction that resulted in fatalities.
e) The 'Yellow Card' system is now reporting deaths associated from 'vaccines' (not vaccines) and errors have already been identified.
I think you are right that the police will not perform their duties, but our responsibility is to ensure all process is followed, all data and evidence collated, and readiness prepared for wider reporting of duty of care failings across all authorities.
When tyranny is exposed through facts and intentional avoidance then the useful idiots (all public servants) need to be informed that due process has been denied and the risk they then face is whether they wish to be called upon for complicity on the day when these people are eventually held accountable (which will happen).
We go peaceful first, we demonstrate the blatant lies, and once all route to recourse has been denied, then we move to the next phase.
@paulbuckingham Very interesting.
@paulbuckingham I agree that they need to be informed and that could be done, we have evidence of the whole fraud taken place and genocide as a result. It will be a way of making the police responsible from then on. But to sue on gross negligence and manslaughter, we need evidence (numbers) of bankrupcies, unemployment, mental illnesses, suicides, death through NHS waiting list, poverty, etc, etc. Unless we have all these figures, there is not much that can be done. The police has not right to limit or pick and choose on what grounds the Government can be or can not be sued. It is the duty of the police to protect us and not the criminals.