Follow the science he tells us. Well, are they following science? Does anyone else on this forum remember (even first/middle school science) - we were taught that a good scientist is as unbias as possible. We look at all the date, for and against our theory, then make an informed choice. With this in mind, why does the government listen to one particular view which supports the narrative they have chosen? Have we seen a 'fair' debate - where arguments against the government have been given either a fair hearing, or that have been evenly matched in terms of qualified individuals (ITV - they will happily put Dr Hilary on the stand against a lay person and favour his view, but another doctor who is against the main narrative?). There are no doctors you may say, they are all in agreement with the government. Or are they? Take Dr Carl Heneghan from Oxford University for example... He did not seem to think that the arguments or data for the Lockdown 2.0 were sound. Or did I just misread this. I am after all, just another conspiracy nut...
He was assigned as a buffon psycopath (ideal) to implement the Agenda. He just wants power and money that comes from vaccines (massive industry). Ignorant people allways fall for the buffons (not that I would have vote for labour either) and that's the game. Just need to see how Biden is winning the election not a winning but a assignation through fraud.
Rita - He doesn't seem to have much grey matter either, in fact the whole family are deranged and they survive no matter what.
Simple answer Yes and he continues to do so - are they all compromised so they ll agree to anything? It seems so, he’s most likely been promised an island with a continuing supply of women. his record shows he cannot be faithful to one women even after being married!!!!
Maybe we should all read his fathers books to know what happens next- one was about a Virus and the other about
over -population!!
The government have lied. They have never produced a single shred of evidence to justify their claims whilst agencies independent of the government have continuously shown verifiable results to their testing.
Indeed - however we should be at least presented with a balanced view. My issue is the fact that action with catastrophic consequences is being taken using the science as justification, when the methods themselves are flawed.
Funding - actually, that is another point to raise on this... I am not posting it here, as this is primarily about Boris and his Lockdown v2, however in addition to following the science, is anyone following the money???
Yes Boris did lie, and no you are not a nut. I have never known any Doctor or Scientist ever do anything but agree to disagree. Most of them lie so as to maintain the mystery of what they are trying to solve so that they make sure they get next years funding in.