Follow the science he tells us. Well, are they following science? Does anyone else on this forum remember (even first/middle school science) - we were taught that a good scientist is as unbias as possible. We look at all the date, for and against our theory, then make an informed choice. With this in mind, why does the government listen to one particular view which supports the narrative they have chosen? Have we seen a 'fair' debate - where arguments against the government have been given either a fair hearing, or that have been evenly matched in terms of qualified individuals (ITV - they will happily put Dr Hilary on the stand against a lay person and favour his view, but another doctor who is against the main narrative?). There are no doctors you may say, they are all in agreement with the government. Or are they? Take Dr Carl Heneghan from Oxford University for example... He did not seem to think that the arguments or data for the Lockdown 2.0 were sound. Or did I just misread this. I am after all, just another conspiracy nut...