Elsewhere on this forum there was a query as to why the fraud of the 'test' is not included in the papers for the Judicial review - I now cannot find that post so am writing this.
This test is the 'evidence' for the current malfeasance being committed by the (current) 'government'. It is the weapon of choice in maintaining the scam and increasing the destruction of freedom of humanity. The willing victims that line up for this medical fraud are unintentionally increasing the 'infection' numbers and so are complicit in the scam.
The young men and women who stated they were RAF, offering 'tests' in Birmingham surely need our sympathy as they seemed not to know what they were doing, implying the following of orders blindly , which itself shows that those senior officers giving the orders do not know the truth either.
Those in 'government' that DO know the truth and whose names are known, must be included within all legal actions as they are building their main shaky pantomime on a blatant piece of illusion which they maintain in the face of expert knowledge to the contrary! Is that due to panic, blind arrogance or duress? It is probably too late to add this aspect to the Judicial Review, but we would be pleased to receive a comment on this from Simon or others.
I understand the legal case being launched by the German doctor Schoening (please forgive spelling) will use the fraudulent use of the test as a key fact in its argument.
Good evidence for any Court! I was intrigued that the 'gov' didn't supply any evidence for the injunction hearing, and yet the Judge found for them, however he/she wrapped that statement up.
No evidence exists for their actions, so it cannot be presented for the Judicial Review, unless the Judge is 'carefully chosen' surely justice will prevail !
There is not enough emphasis on the inadequate PCR test. I found this information back in March