Government MASS VACCINATION PROGRAMME - A limited consultation!!

this - https://www.youtube.com/watch?ab_channel=AgentFearlessCanuckGivvin%27erSpoonz&feature=emb_logo&v=uEo3rnU12jw&app=desktop

And .. There is this too from 2009 - health workers must be aware of this

Health Authorities Now Admit Severe Side Effects of Vaccination : Swine flu, Pandemrix and Narcolepsy

Uptake will decide if it becomes mandatory..I.e you can’t travel etc etc .it won’t be compulsory ,but you won’t be able to do f uk all . if enough people take it up then we should be Ok ....I think they will base the decision on enough to cover the ass, and a world wide take up .

MickeyG - There is plenty of evidence to say that the new vaccines were tested on animals as well as humans if you look for it. I'm against animal testing full stop, but that's for another discussion. It seems the animal trials were done at the same time as the human ones. This is what PETA had to say: 'Pfizer and BioNTech didn’t wait for lengthy tests on monkeys and mice but did the majority of the animal tests at the same time that the vaccine was being tested on humans. The message for the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is clear: Improve vaccine research by removing the requirement for lengthy animal trials. Decades have been wasted on misleading animal studies intended to develop vaccines to prevent HIV, tuberculosis, Zika, and other deadly diseases, with nothing to show for it. It’s time to shift the focus from yesterday’s science and embrace the new model that Pfizer, Moderna, and other companies have pioneered—and to take it a step further by replacing animal tests with more reliable and human-relevant animal-free ones.'

To be honest Mickey, I'm still writing to MPs to get the bloody lockdown lifted along with the petty restrictions. For me the vaccine fight is for another day. By the way, I'm not against people having it, the same as the the flu jab. It's just not for me thank you.

I was listening to the Richie Allen interview with Prof. Dolores Cahill last night (https://www.podomatic.com/podcasts/richieallen/episodes/2020-11-17T11_35_09-08_00 ) Starts at 59 mins in. Towards the end, she mentions animal testing. I am not an advocate of animal testing but it is a major part of the process used when developing vaccines. It would appear that we may have dropped the ball on that one because nobody seems to be talking about this (or I missed it). Definitely not on MSM. Perhaps we should be writing to our MPs and asking whether they have successfully completed all animal testing and that they provide the data that prove the results. This may well throw a spanner in the works for them. I am considering doing a mass mail to all MPs. Any thoughts?

MRHA urgently commissioned a covid19 vaccination Adverse Reactions AI system, (link below) which explicitly states their current system will not be able to handle the volume of adverse and unforeseen reactions they expect, quote:

'It is not possible to retrofit the MHRA’s legacy systems to handle the volume of ADRs that will be generated by a Covid-19 vaccine. Therefore, if the MHRA does not implement the AI tool, it will be unable to process these ADRs effectively. This will hinder its ability to rapidly identify any potential safety issues with the Covid-19 vaccine and represents a direct threat to patient life and public health.'

https://ted.europa.eu/udl?uri=TED:NOTICE:506291-2020:TEXT:EN:HTML&src=0

If you are concerned about where all this is going, and you want to take some action that will help to stop it, and you feel like petitions and protests aren't cutting it, here is an option: Free yourself from the black magic legalese system and learn the Art of standing as a wo/man setting your own law. Once you grok the inner shift and stand as a wo/man setting your law, by notices to another of mankind (Johnson for instance or Hancock), and once you are prepared to press claims in court they will start to back off. Right now the noose is tightening because we are all running around as citizens and persons not understanding what it is to stand as a wo/man in law. Or else we give money to Govt Agents pressing Judiciary reviews which go absolutely nowhere as its simply playing their game on their terms. We have to stand man to man in court. No Mr Govt. Its i: a man vs the man: Johnson. Bring each man and woman to account individually. Spoiler Alert - I am on the 12 week course and its challenging. You will be right up against yourself. But this is war. Either you put your big boots on and go out there or you go down. For our children's sake I think you'd all agree - we have to go big right? ❤️ Law for Mankind Landing Page : https://mankind.thesovereignsway.com/sl/your-life-by-your-law-app/?ref=21

Trespass No More PDF Free Download: https://mankind.thesovereignsway.com/sl/trespass-pdf/?ref=21 Trespass No More 2 PDF Free Download: https://mankind.thesovereignsway.com/sl/school-pdf/?ref=21

Hi Neo,

Thanks for the post. My issue with this is that, having read the first sentence of the Introduction which goes "COVID-19 is the biggest threat this country has faced in peacetime history....." pretty much sums it all and put me right off considering that everything that will follow will be based on the premise of this BIG LIE (Covid19 downgraded from HCID status by said government plus everything else that has transpired since). So... where do we go from here? It would seem that our main goal should be exposing this BIG LIE if we are to get anywhere, in my opinion. Funny how they didn't "consult" with us on lockdown 🤓.

If this is the worst health crisis since whenever it is definitely not due to poor little corony, who was described as no longer a disease of high consequence on 19th March

Have you seen the revised death toll figures produced by the CDC in the States? Well, if ours were reviewed in the same way the numbers might be quite interesting.

https://principia-scientific.com/finally-cdc-admits-just-9210-americans-died-from-covid19/?fbclid=IwAR1bhbXDmWyaBhhd4BtDL46-4INO1H31CmRonTGA7KN5LtO5zrltJOVm_lo

In essence, the proposal is that because of the worst emergency this country has ever faced since the second world war when the miracle vaccine is ready pharmaceutical companies will be exempt from product liability. In other words, if it kills or maims you the company will not be liable for resultant loss in a civil action. There will be some conditions on this limitation but they will of course be meaningless.

Here is my letter to my MP regarding this. A fairly pointless exercise but I want him on record, in any event, should there ever be a day of reckoning.

"Dear

I have received notice that the Government requires representations with regard to changes to Human Medicine Regulations to support the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines by 18th September next. It appears from the Government statement that representations are mainly welcomed from certain stakeholders who apparently are well versed in legislative language and not a mere individual like myself.

As one of your constituents would you please let me know whether you support pharmaceutical companies being exempt from product liability in law and if so why?

Would you table or support an amendment to any proposed legislation in this regard that should pharmaceutical companies be so exempt any government of the day will accept full responsibility for any loss of life or injuries to health resulting from such exemption."

My MP is a Conservative but such a letter can be adapted if the MP is in the (laughable) opposition.

Surely they cannot LOCKDOWN a nation, surely they cannot suppress human rights, surely they cannot destroy our economy, surely they cannot overstate death rates, surely they cannot exaggerate hospitals being overrun, surely! No basis for trust remains and all laws can be legislated around, hence the corona virus act.

Surely they cannot override Article 8 of the Nuremberg Code?

Everyone needs to read this and take action. Thanks for posting.