Please read my response to my MP after I questioned her on lockdown and the military visiting our homes. Her response was to say basically, do as you are told or be prosecuted! - WRONG ANSWER! If you want to use any or all of it in your own letters, please feel free.: =================================================================== Dear Ms Howells Thank you for not answering any of my concerns. Firstly, there are enough Covid19 testing stations in and around local areas, should those choosing to be tested opt for that choice. To then be further targeting households in an attempt to coerce, bully or pursued householders on their doorsteps., with the added perceived intimidation of soldiers standing on or nearby the door step is nothing short of intimidation tactics in an attempt to ensure everyone is tested despite this not being a mandatory requirement I assure you Ms Howells that the reaction to seeing a member of HM armed forces, dressed in full combat gear, standing on your doorstep or very close to it is most intimidating and will achieve the response you require of that person. I feel that I am able to quote this with ALL authority after spending five years performing EXACTLY this action during my service for HM Armed forces, whilst in Northern Ireland. Please provide me with your own experiences of such actions and the results of such operations. You have NOT stated if the military option is going to be considered for Wales and in particularly RCT. I ask again. Is this planned or being considered for the RCT area? As to the second part of your letter dealing with blatantly flouting local restriction guidelines, I am a little confused here. My confusion lies in your use of the word Guidelines because Guidelines are simply that, guidelines and are certainly not mandatory or law and so therefore not enforceable. Is this a mistake on your part I wonder? Please clear this confusing statement by explaining how and when a guideline becomes enforceable. As to your claim that I am endangering fellow citizens lives, I do not HAVE Covid so please explain how I am endangering anyone? If I choose to endanger myself due to a Virus that is yet UNPROVEN, then that is my choice but let me remind you that Coronavirus is one of 250+ variants of the common cold, it has never been isolated and so therefore has NEVER been declared or classified as a Virus, dangerous or otherwise. It has Failed all four of the Koch Postulates, used for the past 130 years to classify a virus and as of March 2020 Covid19 is no longer considered as a high consequence infectious disease (HCID) in the UK. The testing of this virus is KNOWN to be unreliable in fact the designers of the PCR test have specifically stated that it SHOULD NOT be used as a diagnostics tool as it is know to give up to 80% false positive results. The UK Government have admitted to this problem (report available on request), Meaning that the Government has NO reliable data as to how many, if any people have been affected by this issue at all. Where therefore is the threat? Your claims simply do not hold water Ms Howells I now draw your attention to Article 2.1 of the Anti terrorism act where it explicitly states that....' The following acts are regarded as terrorism:'
'...Violence or threats which aim to bring about fear among people or expose their lives, freedoms and security to danger and their money and properties to damage regardless of its motives and purposes which takes place in the execution of a terrorist act, individually or collectively organized'
Without being able to provide proof of the isolation and classification of the virus, the UK government are CLEARLY in breach of this part of the act by spreading threats and fear amongst the people of a threat that does not exist or that they are unable to prove or justify. Please prove me wrong by supplying me with the proof that the Virus known as Coronavirus, Covid19 or SARSCOV2 has been subjected to and has passed the required tests that qualify this as being a virus. The UK government HAS been asked to provide such information in a court of law and despite these requests, has consistently failed to provide such evidence. If the virus has never been proved then it cannot be legislated against, which questions the validity of the whole Coronavirus2020 Act and suggests that this act is actually null and void. I look forward to your response Stephen Habberley