Simon, please take it to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg? I recommend adding Article 3 (No Torture or Degrading Treatment) to your claim; your studies show mental health impacts. I used Article 3 in Judicial Review against Schedule 8 Coronavirus Act, which allowed 1 medical practitioner to lock up someone in hospital for up to 6 months. Consequently, I sued the Health Secretary to revoke the change to mental health laws a whole 3 months before the Parliamentary Committee Report on the changes [to mental health law] was published, and forwarded my findings to the Committee. I provided the Government with case law and academic studies to prove my case, had the support of the public (included witness statements in support of my case), appeared on a news reel on LatestTV News Brighton, and had an article of mine published in the 'BackBencher' online a month before the Committee's report. I had the moral support of a highly influencial QC throughout. The changes are now expired.
Has your mental health been impacted by Lockdown? Mine is/was.
Throughout the case I have had the support of my local MP (Tahir Ali MP)....
CO/2532/2020 - The Queen [on the Application of Lijeh Anthony Perez] v The Secretary of State for Health & Social Care, and Others....
See link to news appearance :- https://thelatest.co.uk/brighton/2020/08/31/update-on-lockdown-and-mental-health/
High Court, Queen's Bench Division, Administrative Court. Challenging the lawfulness of Part 2 Schedule 8 Coronavirus Act 2020, which makes changes to the Mental Health Act 1983 – allowing 1 medical practitioner to authorise detention in hospital under s2 or s3 of the MHA. Alleging breach of Article 3 Human Rights Act 1998.
" When creating the Act, we included provisions to modify mental health legislation to reduce from two to one the number of doctors’ opinions needed to detain someone under the Mental Health Act 1983 and to extend legal time limits on the detention of mental health patients. These were always powers of last resort, and I was not persuaded, even in the peak, that they were necessary, because our mental health services have shown incredible resilience and ingenuity. I have therefore decided that these powers are no longer required in England and will not remain part of the Act. We will shortly bring forward the necessary secondary legislation to sunset these provisions. " - Health Secretary - Hansard Entry, 30 September 2020.
You can find the Ministerial Order to expire the Law here https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/1467/regulation/2/made ; it expires parts of the Coronavirus Act 2020.
My application for Judicial Review was refused as there is no judicial authority to overturn primary legislation, but good negotiations got that done, as you can see.
The costs order against me is not being enforced.
May I suggest the following case-law ? :-
Pretty v United Kingdom - 2346/02 [2002] ECHR 427
MH v. Secretary of State for the Department of Health & Ors [2005] UKHL 60 - House of Lords Judgement
CASE OF A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (100/1997/884/1096) - Strasbourg Judgement
Hi - it was on the search yes, I found your name on the backbencer.co.uk & then on the black country growth hub, which is the one I contacted.
Its amusing still now - funny how asking questions gets the term conspiracy theorist these days.
happy to reach out.
your very welcome, I'll continue to follow & try to gain more coverage for these issues which are being ignored - on purpose I'd say.
just a quick funny note, I read about some of your work back in Sept & contacted who I thought was your website via a google search - I won't say who or which one now, it was a company in the UK, I made a comment applauding yourself.
The said company phoned up asking why I emailed these comments & expalined why, the guy said oh your a conspiracy theorist then, quite rude quite arrogant & a 2nd guy took over & said to follow governemnt advice & go away effectivly.
Amsuing - very amusing esp as siad place had an award for customer care & politeness.
go figure that one out.
have a awesome xmas & new year anyhow.
awesome piece by L Perez once again, this person needs a high five...
also to the people on here who - I will admit the suicdes have disturbed me a great deal,
Jo parkin costa - you bought a tear to my eyes or 2, my thoughts go out to you, not much is it really I wish I could do or say more but ... peopel like us will be better harder stronger faster at the end of this.
its the suiceds & the peopel who aren't getting help or meidcal treatment(cancer & suicdes - you know my hisotry with thtese 2) is the one thing I hope - I pray that the MSM, the enablers, the compliers who are "enjoying" this - they will be made to suffer at the end & like me I hope you guys will show no remorse for what will happen to them.
x/0
Thats basically a get out clause , but what I have said from my very early posts is that people power is the only way to really change things . only use cash for a month or two . if people stopped buying on line for a month . If people did not use their mobile phones for a month , if people un subscribed to Sky etc for a month or two if people stopped going to big supermarkets where possible for a month.and stayed clear of the big name stores ,if people. Took their money out of banks .
no one pay your mortgage for two months ,,,no one . Don’t wear a mask ,
jut don’t ,,,,,it will never happen but the potential is there to fukc these cnuts up .
But people are to selfish and most brainwashed ,
after watching and ( being at ) at the protests in London Im not going to carry any id on me at all . Just cash in my pockets and my key .
I dont carry my phone anyway except if I’m out training on my bike. You have the right to remain silent ,,,,,,I will . I don’t have a record ( don’t know how 😀)
so thats how I’m rolling from now on . If they don’t take cash then fucthem
great stuff thanks lijeh
Bravo Lijeh - you are amazing and have already achieved a great deal. I do hope Simon is listening.
why can’t you make the politicians who, make these rules personally accountable.
take them to court for harm done .Criminal court . Why the fukc not ?
How are we going to take it to Strasbourg if we are getting out of the EU in three weeks time ?. On the other, it is still a waste of time, this is a criminal matter, not a civil one. We are not dealing with a breach of a human right, but with the removal of all human rights over a fake disease, fraud and genocide.
Well done Lijeh. I remember you posting your success on this forum and it must make people in that situation take heart.
Funny you should post this suggestion at this precis moment as I have just finished reading Simon's review and the same idea crossed my mind and then I picked up your post here on the forum. Good idea I think he should on the basis that we have to try anything and everything to get redress, nothing ventured nothing gained. We might get lucky and as things have to change sometime and its got to be soon. Will you suggest it to him? Good luck with the persuasion.
I agree
This is very relevant. My stepson committed suicide & I work in psychiatric intensive care & the people we receive in crisis is off the scale