I am moved to write to you after watching a speech made by you regarding the UK military forces dealing with the Covid19 vaccine administration throughout the UK.
I would like to ask you the following question:
Why are you discussing a subject that is in clear breach of article 6 of the 2005 UNESCO (bioethics human rights) statement?
By discussing in parliament the option of using the UK military to distribute, administer and manage such a vaccine in such a way indicates that you do not know that the above mentioned charter (the 2005 UNESCO (bioethics human rights) is required to be integrated into the legal framework of every member state. The UK being a full member state, does in fact have these human rights built into its legal framework.
“Noises” are now being made in various places about mandatory vaccinations to deal with the COVID-19 (or future) similar “threats,” however, it should be noted that this would be a fundamental breach of human rights (as would some type of “implanted chip” to enable some type of tracking). It should be noted that mandatory vaccination would be in direct violation of The Nuremberg Code and a violation of article 6 of the UNESCO 2005 Statement On Bioethics And Human Rights. Limiting peoples’ freedom to work, travel or access services based on some kind of “immunity passport” as you indicate within your speech by the issue of a 'vaccination certificate' has all kinds of Human Rights related implications - especially for those who don’t agree that vaccines are a safe or effective way of dealing with infectious diseases.
It could be argued that the individuals human rights must take second place to the national need for health and safety but Mr Elwood, the government are not So worried about the national health and safety when they pass legislation allowing 'grouse shoots' and similar activities of the more privileged people able to afford such entertainments whilst the rest have to endure the bullying of this government relating to a virus that has yet to be classified and so therefore does not 'officially' exist defined under legislation that is illegal because it refers to a virus that has yet to be defined in the legal sense. Need I remind you that the Coronavirus, COVID19, SARSCOV2, call it what you will, has not been the subject of the accepted Koch Postulates, required to classify a virus, in fact the COVID19 virus, when applied to the Koch Postulates WAS UNABLE to satisfy any of the four criteria of the said postulates.
In short Mr Elwood, your suggestions of enforcing a mass vaccination is against the human rights of every person in this country and by attempting to enforce such an edict is tantamount to declaring war on the citizens of this country.
Please be advised Mr Elwood, this country has NEVER been so close to CIVIL WAR since 1639, when the reign of Charles the first was ended by the English civil war. This was started because of a corrupt method of ruling the land where ONE man had full control over everything (how similar is this situation today Mr Elwood?) The armed services were established in order to defend this country and its people against aggressive action by its enemies. THE BIGGEST ENEMY THAT THREATENS THE PEOPLE OF THIS COUNTRY IS THE GOVERNMENT ITSELF. All too busy looking after their own affairs to worry about the job that you are supposed to be doing.
Mr Elwood, you along with every other Member of Parliament took an oath to represent, NOT RULE the people of this country. You have failed in this pledge so I tell you to either step down if you cannot live up to your pledge or STAND UP AND BE COUNTED and represent the people to whom you claimed allegiance to when you wanted their votes. In short Mr Elwood DO YOUR JOB and stop looking after no.1.