Coercing people into taking part in a live human experiment is against International, European and UK laws. It’s wholly illegal, unlawful, unethical and immoral.Vaccine passports are also illegal, unlawful, unethical and immoral under our Rule of Law.Fundamental, inalienable human rights cannot be derogated from in the UK as our Constitution demands that we uphold God’s laws in accordance with the old and new testaments of the King James Bible.Where does it say in the Bible that society can force an experimental injection on to someone and restrict their movements and life because they don’t wish to have their bodily integrity invaded?It doesn’t.And international and UK medical ethics codes and laws confirm this.See the Nuremberg Code, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the ECHR, the Helsinki Declaration, the Oviedo Convention, the Convention on Human Rights and Bioethics, the Human Rights Act, for starters.A State who claims the right to derogate from these rights must prove that they have the right to derogate as the burden of proof is on the State.There is no public health emergency to justify the emergency use of an experimental gene treatment as we have alternative safe treatments
Post by Anna De Buisseret
Coercing people into taking part in a live human experiment is against International, European and UK laws. It’s wholly illegal, unlawful, unethical and immoral. Vaccine passports are also illegal, unlawful, unethical and immoral under our Rule of Law. Fundamental, inalienable human rights cannot be derogated from in the UK as our Constitution demands that we uphold God’s laws in accordance with the old and new testaments of the King James Bible. Where does it say in the Bible that society can force an experimental injection on to someone and restrict their movements and life because they don’t wish to have their bodily integrity invaded? It doesn’t. And international and UK medical ethics codes and laws confirm this. See the Nuremberg Code, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the ECHR, the Helsinki Declaration, the Oviedo Convention, the Convention on Human Rights and Bioethics, the Human Rights Act, for starters. A State who claims the right to derogate from these rights must prove that they have the right to derogate as the burden of proof is on the State. There is no public health emergency to justify the emergency use of an experimental gene treatment as we have alternative safe treatments