MY LATEST FoI: I have sent out this latest FoI off the back of learning about the document called 'Twelve criteria for the development and use of COVID-19 vaccine passports' from the Royal Society ( https://royalsociety.org/-/media/policy/projects/set-c/set-c-vaccine-passports.pdf?la=en-GB&hash=A3319C914245F73795AB163AD15E9021 ) To: Nadhim Zahawi, BEIS Professor Peter Bruce FRS (Chair), The Royal Society Professor Sir Roy Anderson FMedSci FRS, Imperial College London Professor Charles Bangham FMedSci FRS, Imperial College London Professor Richard Catlow FRS, The Royal Society Professor Christopher Dye FMedSci FRS, University of Oxford Professor Sir Marc Feldmann AC FAA FMedSci FRS, University of Oxford Professor Sir Colin Humphreys FREng FRS, Queen Mary University of London Professor Frank Kelly FRS, University of Cambridge Professor Melinda Mills FBA, University of Oxford Professor Linda Partridge FMedSci FRS, The Royal Society Professor Geoffrey Smith FMedSci FRS, University of Cambridge Professor Alain Townsend FRS, University of Oxford Re: COV Star of DavID-19 Vaccine Passports and the Right to Harm Others With NO Burden of Proof To All Concerned, This is a FoI required due to responses from Ministers compared to actions of Government, specifically BEIS, and then including just one recent source (of many others, but usually from the same academic sources) of ‘advice’ that needs to be included due to ‘advice’ maintaining responsibility. I have been in receipt of Parliamentary letterhead official letters stating ‘no plans’ to introduce Vaccine Passports, as Parliamentary speak for using semantics to cover an obvious intent that they do not wish to admit, and I have also been in receipt of direct admission of ‘advice’ from Oxford University and York University during November of 2020 as a result of the call for evidence by the UK Parliament’s Joint Committee on Human Rights (JCHR), whereby long term plans are clearly being made to wriggle an excuse to implement fascistic policies. This is compounded by at least £450K of taxpayer money being awarded to at least 8 sources via BEIS to develop these so-called passports, one of which I have undertaken a level of research toward and divulged what can only be described as an organisation loaded with grifters, but who are gaining attention from what would only be described as morally questionable, or intellectually void, persons that are ‘distracted’ by certain ‘ambassadors’ from this dubious organisation on account of their Royal connections. Then I now see the document produced by those included in this email from the Royal Society discussing the 12 Criteria for these passports that there are ‘no plans’ to implement, in what is an entirely clear case of denying that which you are clearly doing. Much like the problems of Government blindly following the cult-ish narrative of man-made AGW, that I have proven elsewhere as having zero burden of proof, so it is with an ever expanding level of mass hysteria amongst so-called ‘experts’ and members of Government that have very much completely lost any sense of logical thought in regard to a virus that not one you can provide the burden of proof for, and have entered into what can only be considered deranged paranoia in conjunction with DCMS, through various collaborations to remove question and facts from various sources, such as social media. This has been so demented as to have a video produced by myself removed from YouTube (and the ‘massive reach’ of 100 or so views that apparently Government was so afraid of), as I fact checked the ‘fact check’ that was actually sent to me by the Government Office for Science, as an attempt to provide the burden of proof, which was staggering in it’s incompetence by way of sending a ‘fact check’ back to me within a FoI that was written by a child with zero knowledge on anything, other than having previously written for the far left wing rag, Buzzfeed, and this was somehow deemed a good idea. So, from this recent paper that seeks to obfuscate all sense, logic and decency, let alone basic rights, and wishes to present advice as to how the UK Government can introduce it’s modern day version of the Star of David, I want to draw attention to one very specific line, which is ‘The rights and freedoms afforded to individuals does not provide them with the freedom to potentially harm others’ (Page 10). Obviously the irony of this statement is lost on all of you in your attempts to drag the world into your collective loss of your minds. Perhaps many of you have spent too much time talking to the Eugenics Society, more commonly known these days as the Galton Instititute (you know who you are, and so do I). So, as you have zero burden of proof for everything being peddled in relation to the actual causations of what you have called COVID-19, and as Professor Sharon Peacock is completely unwilling to provide any evidence for the litany of rhetoric for her claimed variants, nor willing to explain how the rarity of zoonotic evolution can suddenly and totally defy all historical knowledge and simply ‘mutate’ willy nilly from the merest contact with anyone in a given region, as well of course your continued clinging on to the PCR tests that have finally seen even Professor Chris Whitt-less admit during one of his many ‘here’s what we made up today’ contradictions, has absolutely no basis of evidence nor usefulness as a form of diagnostic tool, it then leads me to make a suggestion of my own as my FoI, which is: As ‘do no harm’ is the core duty of any medical practice, and ‘duty of care’ is the primary principle for any politician, I want to know the considerations for total and retrospective removal of any indemnification from any and all related organisations, institutions and individuals having any related involvement or advice relating to this entire direct, or indirect COVID-19 debacle, going right back to any claimed first knowledge, whereby ramifications would be enforced on the individual themselves, i.e. not having the taxpayer pick up the tab for your individual errors, misjudgements, ill intentions etc., whereby this specifically includes (but is not limited to) all politicians that failed in basic due diligence, advisors producing papers such as the one in question here due to it’s morally bankrupt intentions, any pharmaceutical organisation, including every single behind the scenes vaccine developer such as ‘Vaccitech’ and all persons with conflict of interest and funding of narratives to produce false perceptions such as the Wellcome Trust et. al. This removal of indemnification would also further include any and all processes subject to the Nuremberg Code. Further, that equal consideration to this flagrant disregard of all human rights be given to an independently led criminal investigation (i.e. not led by yet another one of these crony socialist advocates of the narrative) into the entire background and resulting actions relating to this COVID-19 narrative, whereby the investigation must be criminal, and not civil, especially in light of the infringements to the rights and liberties of those who are external to this investigation and whose lives are being harmed by these actions. If you are all willing to publicly sign a contract removing all indemnification and will assist a public criminal investigation under threat of perjury, then you may stand some semblance of credibility, however, if you continue this undemocratic, totalitarian behind the scenes cowardice route to insanity that seeks to harm others who are perfectly healthy, then I would call on every single one of you to resign your positions immediately as you will have proven your untrustworthiness in being unwilling to stand by the actions you are seeking to force onto others. P.S. I have been unable to track the contact details of Professor Sir John Skehel, so as many of you have worked with him, perhaps you can ask him to also sign the suggested contract for his ‘contribution’.