Hi all. I urge you to please share this with as many people as possible, even with those that may have differing views from yours.
Silently but relentlessly, both the European Union and the UK Government (magically they seem to agree on this now...) are already in the process of passing a law/directive through the respective parliaments, named Regulation EU2020/1043, aiming to legally remove any risk assessments or consent for administration of vaccines for covid-19 containing GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms), like the AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine under development and already purchased by the UK government, 90 million doses:(https://www.gov.uk/government/news/millions-could-be-vaccinated-against-covid-19-as-uk-secures-strong-portfolio-of-promising-vaccines)
You can see the legal text/evidence below:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2020/1043/2020-12-31/data.xht?view=snippet&wrap=true
See articles/sections (17), (22) and (23)
"concerning medicinal products containing or consisting of GMOs intended to treat or prevent COVID‐19, an environmental risk assessment or consent in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC or Directive 2009/41/EC are not a prerequisite".
And section (13): "In this situation of public health emergency, it is of major interest for the Union that safe and efficacious medicinal products intended to treat or prevent COVID-19 can be developed and be made available within the Union as soon as possible".
This effectively allows to speed up the vaccine development process and removes legal barriers (including risk assessments and patient consent) for the administration of covid-19 vaccines, on the basis of "safeguarding public health", and for as long as the WHO continues declaring covid-19 as a global pandemic.
I am no lawyer, just a father, husband and an engineer, but the first challenge to this unlawful directive that I see may be the fact that the WHO is co-funded by the same entities that are developing the vaccines for covid-19 (e.g. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation - please see WHO funders in wikipedia). Therefore this constitutes a flagrant conflict of interest, and may invalidate any legal text based on criteria from the WHO with regard to administration of vaccines.
The directive was silently put forward by the European Commission on the 13th July, and has already been picked-up by the UK government, as EU regulation will continue to apply until the end of the transition period on 31/12/2020. For the UK transposition see also:
Please share this with as many people as possibly, via all channels that you can access. I will try and reach Simon Dolan in case he is still unaware of this. We must stand and fight this and will need legal support. This is a defining moment that will determine what type of world and future we will build and accept for us, our children and fellow human beings.
In unity and compassion we will stand strong and will not be silenced or defeated.
notice
november, 11, 2020
to the man: matt hancock; who at times from the man: joe bloggs
acts as secretary for health & social care 56 whorton road,
house of commons, lewes
london, sw1a 0aa l45 2dt
greetings to the man: matt hancock; who at times acts as secretary for health and social care, at, house of commons, london, sw1a 0aa;
i: a man; joe bloggs, present notice to you a man, simply as a man, in regard to collusion with orders, specifically, in regard to;
> coronavirus act, 2020; including national lockdown and local covid alert level
interventions tiers;
> health protection, coronavirus, restrictions, england, regulations, 2020;
> public health, control of disease, act, 1984, as amended by the health
protection act 2008;
> civil contingencies act, 2004;
i, say that, said orders may cause harm to i, others in the care of i, including brothers and sisters of i, and other property of i, over which i, have rights, by way of, but not limited to, as follows; in,
being unable to buy food, clothing, fuel, medicines and other items i, require,
in restriction or denial of access to medical, dental, care, schools or other
public services,
via harassment, intimidation or terrosism, in not wearing a face covering,
via sanctions, penaltys or monetary fines, given by agents of the
government,
in not wearing a face covering, in not social distancing and in attending
gatherings and social events
on providing support to those in the care of i, or, receiving support from those caring for i
via unlawful detainment, confinement, quarantine, restraint, forced testing,
examination or vaccination,
via the test, track and trace of i, or, forcible entry to property of i, or others in
the care of i,
via restrictions on travel in meeting the needs of i, or others in the care of i,
via any other harm caused to i, by agents of the government, or others, or,
via distress caused to i, or others in the care of i, in consequence of said orders;
i, say, due to collusion by you, matt hancock; man, with the force of said restrictions, i will seek compensation for harm done to i, or others in the care of i, and all property of i, as a consequence of said orders, specifically, in regard to;
> coronavirus act, 2020; including national lockdown, local covid alert level
interventions tiers;
> health protection, coronavirus, restrictions, england, regulations, 2020;
> public health, control of disease, act, 1984, as amended by the health
protection act 2008;
> civil contingencies act, 2004;
i, say, said orders will be considered trespass by way of harm, intimidation, harassment, terrorism, extortion, collusion, loss, theft; whereupon, i will be happy to invite you to a court of law, for each and every instance of trespass, so you, the man; matt hancock, may explain why this is not trespass;
i, say, if at that time you do not have lawful excuse, i, will press my claim, against you the man; matt hancock, for each and every instance of trespass in the amount of £25,000 and £1 per second said trespass did continue; that said;
i, say, specifically, in regard to forced medical testing, vaccination, quarantine, detainment, confinement or examination or any loss of property of i, i, will consider as trespass by way of extortion, harm, theft, loss and, i, require, compensation in the amount of £10,000,000, and £1 per second said trespass did continue and any residue, of medical tests or vaccines, remains in the property of i; from you, the man; matt hancock;
i, say all herein be true and will verify at open court;
by, a man; joe bloggs.
An act can only have the power of law when the governed consent...watch
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPnhgLWq75g