To see this working, head to your live site.

WHO WISHES TO SUPPORT AN EMAIL TO SIMON ?

There has been a discussion on this forum on making enquiries about finding a QC to take on a criminal case against named people responsible for the UK 'pandemic'. The discussion has included -

the rules applying in a private prosecution when approaching a QC

what part, if any, of the legal fund is allocated for the legal work carried out, or to repay Simon

what conclusions have been reached by Simon and the lawyers about the next legal move, if any

is the crowd-fund pledged only to the Legal Review or can it be used for other legal purposes

would the lawyers comment on the above please?

To get a wider idea of who supports this enquiry, please may we collect (forum) names as a reply to this post?

166 comments

166 Comments

xena artray

Feb 23, 2021

look after yesterdays BS press conference =route out 😀 we need to keep this fight going , and these sites going . its not over . How can it be . Look at the horrific damage that has been placed on people . We need these sites etc to grow now not fade away .

we must keep stepping up , anyway we can , next protest on the 20 th , let’s keep supporting anything and anyone , plenty of things still in the process .

Yes we disagree , its human nature but and this is important

OUR AIM IS THE SAME

xena artray

Feb 22, 2021

How do we support these cases , so we donate ,fine . That’s it .

How about having everyone support by signing something . This is a case made on behalf of the 200.000 citizens who have signed . Wouldn’t that make a difference. Some FUKING weight behind the case . Not one man but a case on behalf of the citizens of the U.K. etc etc .

Maria Hannah

Feb 23, 2021

Replying to

@Rosie That's what simon does daily on twiter

Rosie

Feb 23, 2021

Replying to

@Maria Hannah This forum is not Twitter.

Unknown member

Feb 24, 2021

Replying to

@Rosie My son has always said that we were the elite of the websites. 😉

Unknown member

Feb 22, 2021

Right! Plenty of criticism - do you have any answers? Perhaps you could channel some of the energy you constantly put into this forum, and elsewhere, same old, same old going round in circles, take up the sword and go get whatever nobody else is able to achieve and come back with a positive and not a negative

solution.

Maria Hannah

Feb 22, 2021

Replying to

I always had good feelings about MOB, and his case is designed to win, the question is it is something new and though it should work, as common law is in reality the genuine law and not the one made up by the corrupted government private corporation, he could ended up with a corrupt judge who hates real democracy. So my idea is, lets having good faith in the MOB's case but lets build a back up at the same time. Remember that all we need for a private prosecution is a solicitor and nothing more. Lets find a modest solicitor, they happen to be the intelligent ones, and because of that they are not corrupted. At the same time, their fees happen to be more justifiable and they always want to win. We don't need a solicitor with influence or titles, we all know how did they get it and it was not through merits. All we need is to find a modest solicitor, a vocational one and set a crowfunding where he or she can receive the funds. Anyone on this forum know a solicitor ?

Unknown member

Feb 23, 2021

Replying to

@Maria Hannah I agree and when we first started all this and thought it was a good idea to start again on our own I thought we should find someone outside of the greater London area, because overheads are much lower etc. Noticed 586 views following - no Solicitors included there. I think MOB has his own Judge in the team who is obviously connected to Common Law as crossing over from one system to another creates a problem as happened this week when Jim Smith (Common Law connected) went to the Westminster Court with a case and the Judge was at the very least dismissive. I worked in the the Inner Temple just off Fleet Street there and its a strange world. Most of those at the top are Public School educated, out of touch with the real world, very clique and

living a very good life on top salaries. When they took away legal aid a few years ago and it meant that those less fortunate were out in the cold, they could have fought harder to get it reinstated, they didn't and that says it all for me. Of course there are those who have scruples and I wish I knew how we find them.

egrebbell

Feb 22, 2021

unless Michael Bernician comes up Trumps looks like we’re relying on other countries. How can Peru action against Gates & Soros?

Unknown member

Feb 22, 2021

Replying to