"The lockdown has and will lead to devastating economic impact (massive unemployment, tax increases, closure of businesses, reduced tax receipts etc) It has, and will lead to far more deaths from suicide, undiagnosed conditions, untreated conditions - indeed far more than would have been potentially saved by the lockdown."
In the above paragraph taken from one of the pages the statement actually contradicts itself.
I'm not being pedantic here but surely if you want to be taken seriously they this is something that can easily be thwarted. Should it not read like this instead?
- indeed far more than would have been potentially saved " without"the lockdown?
Just thought I'd point out this pretty obvious bad copy mistake.