Hi all. I urge you to please share this with as many people as possible, even with those that may have differing views from yours.
Silently but relentlessly, both the European Union and the UK Government (magically they seem to agree on this now...) are already in the process of passing a law/directive through the respective parliaments, named Regulation EU2020/1043, aiming to legally remove any risk assessments or consent for administration of vaccines for covid-19 containing GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms), like the AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine under development and already purchased by the UK government, 90 million doses:(https://www.gov.uk/government/news/millions-could-be-vaccinated-against-covid-19-as-uk-secures-strong-portfolio-of-promising-vaccines)
You can see the legal text/evidence below:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2020/1043/2020-12-31/data.xht?view=snippet&wrap=true
See articles/sections (17), (22) and (23)
"concerning medicinal products containing or consisting of GMOs intended to treat or prevent COVID‐19, an environmental risk assessment or consent in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC or Directive 2009/41/EC are not a prerequisite".
And section (13): "In this situation of public health emergency, it is of major interest for the Union that safe and efficacious medicinal products intended to treat or prevent COVID-19 can be developed and be made available within the Union as soon as possible".
This effectively allows to speed up the vaccine development process and removes legal barriers (including risk assessments and patient consent) for the administration of covid-19 vaccines, on the basis of "safeguarding public health", and for as long as the WHO continues declaring covid-19 as a global pandemic.
I am no lawyer, just a father, husband and an engineer, but the first challenge to this unlawful directive that I see may be the fact that the WHO is co-funded by the same entities that are developing the vaccines for covid-19 (e.g. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation - please see WHO funders in wikipedia). Therefore this constitutes a flagrant conflict of interest, and may invalidate any legal text based on criteria from the WHO with regard to administration of vaccines.
The directive was silently put forward by the European Commission on the 13th July, and has already been picked-up by the UK government, as EU regulation will continue to apply until the end of the transition period on 31/12/2020. For the UK transposition see also:
Please share this with as many people as possibly, via all channels that you can access. I will try and reach Simon Dolan in case he is still unaware of this. We must stand and fight this and will need legal support. This is a defining moment that will determine what type of world and future we will build and accept for us, our children and fellow human beings.
In unity and compassion we will stand strong and will not be silenced or defeated.
As far as I know as well as conflicts of interests which of course are there, we have sovereign right over our bodies period. There has to be a way to address royal assent for the powers thus comes from ? What do you think
read https://rightsofmankind.thesovereignsway.com/trespass-no-more-pdf
The only way forward is for mankind to wake up to the difference between Law and Legal and to stand as a man or woman stating his/her law by giving clear Notice and making claims against those who trespass and do not provide remedy. I have posted elsewhere about this.
This is going to be an individual man to man battle in the courts of law NOT using Lawyers and NOT going along with their legal word-spells.
Understanding law and trespass is essential knowledge for all of us now. I share this link as 1 of many out there to try and help not because I make anything out of it:
The Observation Deck, Jesse Casanova as well as sui juris on FB and Greg Paul are the big voices out there desperately waving flags the masses are missing.
Downloaded, thanks x
@Ajay This movement speaks about the same. Non Consent and we need to stand as man or woman against them. https://www.solutionsempowerment.com/nonconsent1
Statuts, regs, guidance all of that is legal bollox that applies to citizens.
You are NOT a citizen. You can choose to be, when it suits you.
You are first and foremost a man or woman and Govt is here to serve you not rule you. Govt makes up all this legal stuff to govern citizens. Thus step outside of the legal game and get back to an understanding of YOUR LAW as a man.
Its very simple. As long as you do no harm you are free to set your own law.
Harm escalates to Trespass escalates to a claim to be pressed in court against another man or woman NOT against the Govt or a title.
The hierarchy is:
Man or Woman (Law)
The Govt (here to serve the individual man or woman)
Citizens (Dogs Cats Mice ie ruled by legalese)
Right now the Govt has got the whole world running for cover because we have all forgotten we are Number 1 a man or woman and instead all behaving like scared children.
They are just thugs in uniform with titles on a power trip. The sooner we all wake up to this and push back with Notices to the man who goes by the name of Boris the better.
Agreed ...awarriorcalls.com and earthunited.global are very useful resources on this....pleas register and register for the commns app on earthunited so we can stay in touch when the internet goes down
here is an excellent video from the Corbett Report detailing how authorities are coached in dealing with anyone in a public debate who questions the given narrative on vaccination
https://www.corbettreport.com/how-to-deal-with-vocal-vaccine-deniers-propagandawatch/
Thank you Wuzzy, this was a interesting video. James has some pretty good talks on other subjects, i'd urge people to take a look at his channels.
I was going to make a post about this very James Corbett video but thought I'd check that it's not here already, people really need to check out the video and all the sources that James cites, this is literally the psyop they'll be using against the population and most will fall for it:
https://www.corbettreport.com/how-to-deal-with-vocal-vaccine-deniers-propagandawatch/
If you are concerned about where all this is going, and you want to take some action that will help to stop it, and you feel like petitions and protests aren't cutting it, here is an option: Free yourself from the black magic legalese system and learn the Art of standing as a wo/man setting your own law. Once you grok the inner shift and stand as a wo/man setting your law, by notices to another of mankind (Johnson for instance or Hancock), and once you are prepared to press claims in court they will start to back off. Right now the noose is tightening because we are all running around as citizens and persons not understanding what it is to stand as a wo/man in law. Or else we give money to Govt Agents pressing Judiciary reviews which go absolutely nowhere as its simply playing their game on their terms. We have to stand man to man in court. No Mr Govt. Its i: a man vs the man: Johnson. Bring each man and woman to account individually. Spoiler Alert - I am on the 12 week course and its challenging. You will be right up against yourself. But this is war. Either you put your big boots on and go out there or you go down. For our children's sake I think you'd all agree - we have to go big right? ❤️ Law for Mankind Landing Page : https://mankind.thesovereignsway.com/sl/your-life-by-your-law-app/?ref=21
Trespass No More PDF Free Download: https://mankind.thesovereignsway.com/sl/trespass-pdf/?ref=21 Trespass No More 2 PDF Free Download: https://mankind.thesovereignsway.com/sl/school-pdf/?ref=21
I love this, I saw an Australian guy who teaches the same position and was giving some tips that i have to admit i found quite overwhelming, the realisation of the extent of miseducation and conditioning is ALOT. This is literally why what is happening now has worked so beautifully, it really is testament to how we have been broken down by the state into a learned helplessness and are abdicating our autonomy to mummy daddy state.
With regard to the proposals to exempt pharmaceutical companies
from "product liability"
here is the link to the governments consultation group
you can lodge your comments by 18th september
covidvaccineconsultation@dhsc.gov.uk
Entron........I have looked through the sections you mention above Reg EU 2020/1043.
I understand the text to relate to the clinical trials and marketing of the new vaccine utilising GMOs where this new Reg wiil 'allow' the pharma companies to proceed with trials and marketing without following the usual GMO enviromental risk assessment upon which the EU parliament would usually have to withhold or give its formal consent (farcically, they generally give consent on most gmo and pharma stuff anyway because they are so corrupt!).
I of course could be completely wrong in my interpretation and would welcome opinions from any solicitors / lawyers present on this site!
With regard to the "Public Consultation" I assume that Simon and the team are aware of this and I for one would greatly appreciate help in formulating a response with suggested cogent and articulate points to register our objection to this dangerous and unwarranted attack on our inalienable human rights and personal freedoms .
I believe that suggestions and advice from KBF will be invaluable in order to counter the inevitable accusations that our objection and response are nothing more than what could be expected from " unstable anti vaxxers "!
I apologise if this matter is already being discussed elsewhere on the Forum, but I have been unable to find such information. As responses have to be lodged by Friday 18th, time is of the essence.
Thanks people.
PLEASE everyone - can you take 4 mins out of your day to respond to the UK Govt plans to vaxx us all with an unlicensed vaxx that will have zero liability to anyone involved if it cripples you?
You can simply cut n paste all of the answers the ANHI has put together below into the Govt response if u dont have time to do the research. (The Govt response link is in here too).
ANHI have made it easy for you to do.
This is so concerning. We need as many people to respond as possible or they will just say we all consented:
DEADLINE is Sept 18th so please can you do it today???
https://www.anhinternational.org/news/uk-law-changes-for-covid-19-mass-vaccination/?utm_source=The%20Alliance%20for%20Natural%20Health&utm_campaign=707f1c2d7c-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2020_09_10_09_40&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_aea8a87544-707f1c2d7c-85021318&fbclid=IwAR1xJGypKLXQEe03oGA2wnSsFdj-B8KieeKQV38gqTkLehKDIZ0LbvKJFls
If we dont all do this the Govt will turn around and say we all consented.
Thankyou 🙏
4 minutes? I wrote a thesis 😂
Thanks so much, my daughter will also respond but I need her to show me how to cut and paste!
Response completed and submitted this morning, thanks for your help, I do hope many more have done so. At the end of the consultation questionnaire was a query asking if anything could be suggested to improve the process!!!
They cannot do this by law already in existence.
Take a look at article 6.1 of the 2005 UNESCO bioethics human rights statement. This whole charter MUST be integrated into member state laws, of which the UK IS a member and so it is part of our laws and cannot be changed at a local level because it is a condition of belonging to the United Nations/UNESCO.
The Article clearly states that any such treatments/procedures etc can only be performed WITH the consent of the individual. Consent can be withdrawn at any time. The UK CANNOT overwrite this law under any circumstances whilst it is a member of the UN/UNESCO. It is printed below for reference.
Article 6 – Consent
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.
2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice. Exceptions to this principle should be made only in accordance with ethical and legal standards adopted by States, consistent with the principles and provisions set out in this Declaration, in particular in Article 27, and international human rights law.
3. In appropriate cases of research carried out on a group of persons or a community, additional agreement of the legal representatives of the group or community concerned may be sought. In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.
This govt appears to feel it has absolute power under both the CVA 2020 & a 1984 public health act to enact by statutory instrument PRECISELY WHAT IT WANTS! And that is exactly what it has been doing for months now.............! At this current moment in time....ALL our fundamental human rights have been removed....AND ITS WELL PAST THE TIME WHEN EVERYONE SHOULD UNDERSTAND THIS!
@Gery W Hi
I disagree with you in that our human rights have not been removed. The UK government cannot remove the Human rights granted under the UNESCO statements, this is international law! They can however ignore them and hope that we, as the people either know nothing about them or are frightening us all into believing that we CANT use them. But we can. We need to be attacking and challenging them from homeland as well as international laws. It does however need a population that are not afraid of fighting back. At the moment, appeasement rules and that never achieved anything.
@stevehabberley Steve.........have you fully read both Acts I mentioned?