Hi all. I urge you to please share this with as many people as possible, even with those that may have differing views from yours.
Silently but relentlessly, both the European Union and the UK Government (magically they seem to agree on this now...) are already in the process of passing a law/directive through the respective parliaments, named Regulation EU2020/1043, aiming to legally remove any risk assessments or consent for administration of vaccines for covid-19 containing GMOs (Genetically Modified Organisms), like the AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine under development and already purchased by the UK government, 90 million doses:(https://www.gov.uk/government/news/millions-could-be-vaccinated-against-covid-19-as-uk-secures-strong-portfolio-of-promising-vaccines)
You can see the legal text/evidence below:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/eur/2020/1043/2020-12-31/data.xht?view=snippet&wrap=true
See articles/sections (17), (22) and (23)
"concerning medicinal products containing or consisting of GMOs intended to treat or prevent COVID‐19, an environmental risk assessment or consent in accordance with Directive 2001/18/EC or Directive 2009/41/EC are not a prerequisite".
And section (13): "In this situation of public health emergency, it is of major interest for the Union that safe and efficacious medicinal products intended to treat or prevent COVID-19 can be developed and be made available within the Union as soon as possible".
This effectively allows to speed up the vaccine development process and removes legal barriers (including risk assessments and patient consent) for the administration of covid-19 vaccines, on the basis of "safeguarding public health", and for as long as the WHO continues declaring covid-19 as a global pandemic.
I am no lawyer, just a father, husband and an engineer, but the first challenge to this unlawful directive that I see may be the fact that the WHO is co-funded by the same entities that are developing the vaccines for covid-19 (e.g. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation - please see WHO funders in wikipedia). Therefore this constitutes a flagrant conflict of interest, and may invalidate any legal text based on criteria from the WHO with regard to administration of vaccines.
The directive was silently put forward by the European Commission on the 13th July, and has already been picked-up by the UK government, as EU regulation will continue to apply until the end of the transition period on 31/12/2020. For the UK transposition see also:
Please share this with as many people as possibly, via all channels that you can access. I will try and reach Simon Dolan in case he is still unaware of this. We must stand and fight this and will need legal support. This is a defining moment that will determine what type of world and future we will build and accept for us, our children and fellow human beings.
In unity and compassion we will stand strong and will not be silenced or defeated.
an act can only have the power of law when the governed consent...watch short video below...so do not consent and serve notice
BBC news 6pm, just announced the government is preparing to roll out the vaccine programme , helped by the military. Nothing to worry about then !!!!!!
Another worrying development is allowing children to consent to being vaccinated. It amounts to child abuse.
https://blogs.mercola.com/sites/vitalvotes/default.aspx?cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=art3HL&cid=20201027Z2&mid=DM692960&rid=996819082
Crimes against humanity, European lawyers co-operating and Lord Sumption seems to be with them. PCR tests exposed. https://youtu.be/kr04gHbP5MQ
https://youtu.be/h4N8ylNGYcQhttps://youtu.be/h4N8ylNGYcQ
For anyone who doesn't know what's happrning in the US and / or how Kew and the Anons work, this provides an indication:
https://nemosnewsnetwork.com/more-17-the-people-know-its-nearly-time/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&inf_contact_key=812651f0631d097ac7e13f68df9862f6680f8914173f9191b1c0223e68310bb1https://nemosnewsnetwork.com/more-17-the-people-know-its-nearly-time/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&inf_contact_key=812651f0631d097ac7e13f68df9862f6680f8914173f9191b1c0223e68310bb1
For anyone who doesn't know what's happrning in the US and / or how Kew and the Anons work, this provides an indication:
https://nemosnewsnetwork.com/more-17-the-people-know-its-nearly-time/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&inf_contact_key=812651f0631d097ac7e13f68df9862f6680f8914173f9191b1c0223e68310bb1https://nemosnewsnetwork.com/more-17-the-people-know-its-nearly-time/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&inf_contact_key=812651f0631d097ac7e13f68df9862f6680f8914173f9191b1c0223e68310bb1
Could action happen faster if malfeasance charges were brought against Hancock, Witty, Vallance and Johnson? Would they have to employ their own legal team? Would they be able to claim back costs as expenses? Cases against the govt seem to be kicked into the long grass, and are defended by govt lawyers at our expense.
Vernon Coleman, malfeasance at 12.50:
https://brandnewtube.com/watch/why-i-believe-politicians-and-advisors-will-go-to-prison_t9eKWJlQEzmZeZv.html
Prof Dolores Cahill - long but very informative:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RY6NiavVp0E&app=desktop
thanks - i am doing that -
You need to inform people not to take the test (politely decline, they can't force you to take it).
They are testing as many people to take their dodgy tests so they can bump up their 'cases' and impose restrictions/lockdowns!
You need to spread this among your friends and family and tell them to spread this information too!
In Birmingham the army is going from house to house offerring people tests!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NeiEAEbHIsE
I seriously hope that the government will exercise a minimum of judgement and will measure the consequences of listening to such poor advice. Otherwise it is likely that things will get messy, with unprecedented social unrest like we haven't seen for a few generations. These impositions may work in China, or in other countries where the cultural values are different, but in Western society we have got accustomed over the past 100 years to question our government decisions and challenge them if necessary, particularly in matters affecting what we consider basic human rights. Forcing medical treatment into citizens is not a pill that many people are going to swallow quietly
Thanks. I think this needs to be shared in all our media channels available.
This MP is not even suggesting, but clearly saying on record at Parliament that the intention is to "issue vaccination certificates recognised internationally so that people are allowed to travel". Does that imply that we will not be allowed to travel if we do not take a covid-19 vaccine?
This parliamentarian should be questioned about this. He may also need to be advised that, by following his advice, the UK government would be in breach of the 2005 UNESCO bioethics human rights statement (article 6.1 - see previous comments above in this same chat).
The intention seems clear, so this will leave no other choice but to rise a legal challenge against this breach of international law on basic human rights
His tone might be subtler than others, but what he is saying is terrifying. He's just saying it like it's already decided, and no big deal!!
Vaccines brought up today in Parliament- Tobias Ellwood https://parliament live.tv/event/index/f9b43e59-b2a3-4d9e-ab6c-f9e3620128aa?in=20:24:24&out=20:28:58
They cannot do this by law already in existence.
Take a look at article 6.1 of the 2005 UNESCO bioethics human rights statement. This whole charter MUST be integrated into member state laws, of which the UK IS a member and so it is part of our laws and cannot be changed at a local level because it is a condition of belonging to the United Nations/UNESCO.
The Article clearly states that any such treatments/procedures etc can only be performed WITH the consent of the individual. Consent can be withdrawn at any time. The UK CANNOT overwrite this law under any circumstances whilst it is a member of the UN/UNESCO. It is printed below for reference.
Article 6 – Consent
1. Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned, based on adequate information. The consent should, where appropriate, be express and may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without disadvantage or prejudice.
2. Scientific research should only be carried out with the prior, free, express and informed consent of the person concerned. The information should be adequate, provided in a comprehensible form and should include modalities for withdrawal of consent. Consent may be withdrawn by the person concerned at any time and for any reason without any disadvantage or prejudice. Exceptions to this principle should be made only in accordance with ethical and legal standards adopted by States, consistent with the principles and provisions set out in this Declaration, in particular in Article 27, and international human rights law.
3. In appropriate cases of research carried out on a group of persons or a community, additional agreement of the legal representatives of the group or community concerned may be sought. In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent.
Response completed and submitted this morning, thanks for your help, I do hope many more have done so. At the end of the consultation questionnaire was a query asking if anything could be suggested to improve the process!!!
Thanks so much, my daughter will also respond but I need her to show me how to cut and paste!
PLEASE everyone - can you take 4 mins out of your day to respond to the UK Govt plans to vaxx us all with an unlicensed vaxx that will have zero liability to anyone involved if it cripples you?
You can simply cut n paste all of the answers the ANHI has put together below into the Govt response if u dont have time to do the research. (The Govt response link is in here too).
ANHI have made it easy for you to do.
This is so concerning. We need as many people to respond as possible or they will just say we all consented:
DEADLINE is Sept 18th so please can you do it today???
https://www.anhinternational.org/news/uk-law-changes-for-covid-19-mass-vaccination/?utm_source=The%20Alliance%20for%20Natural%20Health&utm_campaign=707f1c2d7c-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2020_09_10_09_40&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_aea8a87544-707f1c2d7c-85021318&fbclid=IwAR1xJGypKLXQEe03oGA2wnSsFdj-B8KieeKQV38gqTkLehKDIZ0LbvKJFls
If we dont all do this the Govt will turn around and say we all consented.
Thankyou 🙏
With regard to the "Public Consultation" I assume that Simon and the team are aware of this and I for one would greatly appreciate help in formulating a response with suggested cogent and articulate points to register our objection to this dangerous and unwarranted attack on our inalienable human rights and personal freedoms .
I believe that suggestions and advice from KBF will be invaluable in order to counter the inevitable accusations that our objection and response are nothing more than what could be expected from " unstable anti vaxxers "!
I apologise if this matter is already being discussed elsewhere on the Forum, but I have been unable to find such information. As responses have to be lodged by Friday 18th, time is of the essence.
Thanks people.