Has anybody noticed any difference in the insane behaviour of the hypnotised masses? I had to pop out to pick something up at the Argos section of my local Sainsbury's early this morning and was saddened though not really surprised that I was the only person not virtue signalling compliance with this bs by covering my face with a nappy.
Have any of you had happier experiences? Not that going nappyless would necessarily signify strength of character since they'd still just be toeing a deliberately convoluted line...
On the subject of masks, one of the books I am currently reading is The New Underworld Order by Christopher Story and I came across something interesting regarding the symbolism of masks. The author is discussing synarchy in general and Yale in particular, and under the heading referencing Skull and Bones there is an interesting observation quoted from the artist Margaret Elizabeth Stucki's book (1 Margaret Elizabeth Stucki, War on Light: The Destruction of the Image of God in Man Through Modern Art (Available from Freedom University Press), p. 7. ):
THE SATANIC SYMBOLISM OF THE SKULL Artist Elizabeth Stucki (1) has commented on the mask and the skull in modern art and the symbolic meaning.
Says Stucki:
I found this interesting because my extensive research over the past 11 odd years has informed me that this world is run by Satanists/Luciferians, and it is blatantly obvious now that we are in a spiritual battle. People blindly conforming to the official narrative and refusing to even consider the wisdom coming from truth seekers and tellers and do their own research have chosen to follow the darkness that is Satan.
When I did my weekly Sainsbury's shop yesterday, for the very first time since last June I was not the only person without a mask! Around 20% of other shoppers and staff were not sporting a face nappy! This was a pleasant surprise after witnessing no reduction in hypnotised people in the same place on Monday.