Some of the things I asked myself and broached with others since all this started, please do add your own:
Have you ever worried about having a cough and/or being ”hot to the
touch” so much before?
In February and March, why did UK politicians and advisors, and the
media spend so much time repeating specific words, as if they were
trying to hypnotise us?: “The ‘novel’ coronavirus”; “mass gathering”;
“social distancing”; “the science”; “the new normal”...
Did you find it strange how in March, when most of us were still rather
relaxed about covid 19 celebrities suddenly started “coming forward”
to announce that they had “tested positive” for covid?
Was “save lives” originally part of the government “stay home save
the NHS save lives” mantra?
Did the “stay home” apply to people who were sick, but not with
covid?
Lockdown?
Did you ever wait for, then question when the health promotion
advice was going to come and why we still haven't had any from the
government?
Why has the mainstream media consistently underplay or failed to
report suggested preventions against and treatments for covid,
which have null adverse reactions unlike the NHS practised
ventilator treatment?
Why was the approach to contain covid 19 exclusively focused on
controlling our human behaviours (interactions and relationships)
rather than supporting and boosting human health?
Do you ever question how many people may have simulated their
symptoms and panicked themselves into the ICU?
With symptoms of such a low threshold, how do we know people
were not killed by the NHS ventilator treatment,rather than covid?
If you were one of the many people who used you tube to look
up ways to support your health during the lockdown, did you have
trouble finding the video again a month into the lockdown?
Did you know that the doctors, virologists and researchers who
advised that covid 19 was easily preventable with vitamin C, D
and Zinc had their videos removed from you tube/google?
Did you find that vitamin C, D and Zinc were difficult to buy
on the high street at the height of the lockdown?
Why did the dangers of the ventilators (at one point reported as
the only covid 'treatment') with an 80% mortality rate only come
to light in March once the pandemic peaked in London and
New York? We were told that the disease had already 'devasted'
China, Italy and Spain, did the ventilator deaths not occur
in those countries?
Why was and is covid more important than every other disease?
Why has Bill Gates been central to the BBC's reporting of
the pandemic?
Who voted Bill Gates the global health czar?
Why did racialised stories from America go viral globally in the
middle of an apparently life threatening global health pandemic
and a global economic meltdown?
Why were the BLM protests in America uniformly addressed and
endorsed by the UK establishment?
Why did the mainsteam media appear to encourage the BLM
protests, when we were apparently in the midst of a global
pandemic and a global economic meltdown?
Why did the british establishment address the George Floyd
incident that happened in america as if it was of domestic
importance, given we were in the middle of global pandemic
and global economic meltdown?
Why has Neil Fergusson's wildly inaccurate modelling never
been adequately addressed and investigated, considering it
was supposed to be “the science” justifying lockdown?
Why has the mainstream media barely reported on the impact
of the lockdown on the economy and people?
Why has the mainstream media barely reported on the
impact of the NHS Lockdown on people’s healthcare provision?
Why has the NHS forbidden their staff from talking about
what was really going on in hospitals during the
apparent peak of the pandemic?
Do you believe that the global economy would be allowed
to crash to ‘save lives’ that the WHO said were not in danger? From
a disease that has a mortality rate consistent with winter flu
and the common cold?
Is it acceptable, or ‘science’, that a fever and/or cough are
now suspicions of covid, when they are rather basic functions
of the human body, common to most very mild illnesses
or no illness at all?
Do you suspect that there are alot of people enjoying not having
to travel to work everyday and don't want this to end?
Have you been perplexed with how "the science" keeps
shapeshifting?
Where has the british political opposition been?
More questions
If we are in the middle of a pandemic with clear evidence of this, why is it necessary to drill this message eg notices in shops, announcements.
If coronavirus is dangerous why is that even the BBC who like most of the mainstream admit in an article from March 80% will only get mild symptoms.
Thanks for all the interesting questions. There is one central question I see about this whole process. The richest countries in the world have all crashed their economies with a big rise in unemployment and loads of businesses destroyed. Why did they do this? These are all countries who value their economy and Gross Domestic Product above everything else. So why would they all crash it so quickly and so badly? For what reason? We are told the answer is to save lives. The majority of people who die are older people. Do the rich nations of the world suddenly care so much about the elderly that they would crash their economies to save the elderly? How come that they never seemed to care so much about the elderly before and were happy to cut services for the elderly in previous years? But now they are saying "We don't care how much our economy is ruined, we don't care how many people become unemployed, we don't care if children don't get to school, we don't care if hospital appointments and routine cancer screenings are cancelled.............if we save the elderly it will all be worth it." That is the theory you are being asked to swallow if you believe the official government line.
Great questions!
Why are we using anti bacterial (hand gel) for a virus?
Science (not "the science" which appears to be a government agent taking a backseat so that the psychologists can implement the measures to 'save our NHS and lives') says that bacteria are living organisms while viruses need a host yet the SARS COV 2 can apparently thrive outside a host and be killed (?), placated (?) with 'anti bacterial' (hand gel)?
More questions
If coronavirus is so deadly why have safeguards to ensure deaths are recorded accurately been removed for coronavirus as the link below shows
We are given daily death figures and the impression is given the figures are for people who have died on the same day when in fact the deaths occurred over a longer period of time which the government doesn't explain. If coronavirus is so deadly why is it necessary to resort to dishonesty when presenting daily death figures.
Thanks @LivvyB , good advice. M
Well done, Kemi, John, bryan, Ian for listing all the questions we all want answered. I'm in correspondence with my MP and asking question after question, which of course he can't answer. I think he's getting a bit fed up with me and taking longer to reply. I just wonder if he's in on it or not and how far down the line people are prepared to support all this. Perhaps, that's my question, do our MPs actually know what's going on and how it will affect them as well?
There's another reason these quesions are important. We know many of the answers - but 'unbelievers' don't. Sonia Poulton said the way to get unbelievers on board is not to tell them what is going on, but to keep asking questions to make them think. I bet we've all tried to tell someone else and they just consider you mad - but by putting some of these questions to them, they may start to see the something is seriously wrong and start kicking against it. Maybe.
If we are in the middle of a deadly pandemic, why do many people on the internet feel this is bullshit.
I love these.
Indeed, if the science was so 'settled' why indeed do they have to keep telling us this, clearly we have questions that haven't been answered, and censoring counter theories and arguments.
But this:
👌 I never thought of this, but it does go in hand with this paternalism that the government is assuming; do people really (🤔) believe that the government cares about the population more than people care for themselves, their neighbours and fellow citizens? Really?
Questions from me :-
If we are in the middle of a pandemic and people saw evidence with their own eyes with people dying, people suffering severe symptoms if they survive and local hospitals overrun, why would the government need to introduce draconian legislation with specific instructions what people can't or can do and punishments. In a genuine pandemic wouldn't people voluntarily take precautions without instructions from the government.
If coronavirus is so dangerous, why does a large body of scientific opinion question this?
If those who question the narrative, coronavirus is the new black death are so wrong, why does social media censor them rather than adress their arguments?
If a we are in the middle of a pandemic with large numbers dying and being so ill they can't attend work, why have we seen no evidence of this and labour shortages developing. Why have we seen no evidence of society breaking down due to labour shortages eg food deliveries not getting through due a lack of drivers.
We are told there is a danger of asymptomatic spreaders. Where is the scientific research to support this. If coronavirus is such a dangerous disease, why do some never develop symptoms?
If a we are in the middle of a deadly pandemic, why without media hysteria and lockdownsno one would have noticed we are in a pandemic.
I'll add one or two - why at the beginning of the lockdown - actually a couple of days prior - were all the cash machines in my town suddenly not working?
Why when I first came across the loo paper shortage did the shop worker tell me 'we have toilet paper, it's being kept out the back but not being put out - what sort do you want? I can get it for you' - he also added 'don't believe everything you read / see in the media'.
Oh, and why do all the railway staff at my local RS huddle together without their masks chatting when the place is empty - I'm often the straggler off the train and 'catch them' at it. I had to have a conversation with the ticket controller who being the only one wearing a mask took it off to talk to me at very close range - practically in my face.
I could go on and on actually........
hey I still cant reply to email notifications I can get into the site but not respond to messages which is bit annoying i think the media and government has spread so much fear that general public will do almost anything to survive that is how we have been programmed to a certain extent survival of the fittest and all that to be completive against each other see a enemy you see that In football how they build up rivalry same in wars always a enemy to fight against
I've asked myself nearly all those questions and another one that keeps niggling me is "if the virus was so contagious and virulent as the media/goverment would have you believe why were supermarket workers not dropping like flies?"
some very thoughtful questions better be careful the thought police don't come and get you I certainly did not vote for Bill Gates to be the health czsar I don't think we have any British political opposition they are all united as one in facism just heard recently that places in the North such as Manchester are now having restrictions imposed on them stopping people visiting each other at homes restaurants and pubs that will do the trick i am sure stop anyone from meeting or talking to each other fantastic
Excellent work!!!!!!