The PCR testing system is a giant scam. I could be wrong but I read that it was originally invented for the purpose of identifying cancerous cells (although not sure how many parts of the body it would reach going through the nose) which is why the sample gets magnified under a microscope more than 30 times. The test was never intended to identify virus levels. But that’s exactly why the government has used it for so long, so they can scare as many people as possible with fake case numbers. It’s a miracle that anyone taking a PCR test receives a negative result. Very noticeable that since mass testing has been introduced (especially in Liverpool) the ‘case’ numbers have significantly fallen over the last fortnight. Whatever test they’re using it’s obviously more accurate than Pillar 2, which isn’t difficult! I’m still baffled as to why healthy young, or middle aged, people would want to get tested though. They should all refuse it, unless they like the ridiculous idea of a freedom pass.
The Danish RCT results for face masks were released 10 days ago and not a peep from mainstream media, even the newspapers. The only outlets that i’ve heard it mentioned on are Talk Radio and various YouTube videos that don’t stay up for very long. In a rational world the results of a study like this should be headline news, especially since the last RCT was carried out in Vietnam in 2015, but apparently the MSM have decided that it never happened. Could it be because the trial results showed the inconvenient truth that face masks (especially the stupid blue cloth ones) are next to useless and may actually weaken people’s immune system. Alex Berenson also makes some interesting points about masks in his latest Covid chapter.
If the BBC or Sly News ever mention the Denmark study, even in passing, then I would probably pass out from the shock and then go and buy a big bottle of champagne to celebrate the rare event.
This is from the BBC of all people, and is a probable explanation for what you have just posted above. Your comments welcome as always.
'The main PCR test used to diagnose coronavirus is so sensitive it could be picking up fragments of dead virus from old infections, scientists say.
Most people are infectious only for about a week, but could test positive weeks afterwards. Researchers say this could be leading to an over-estimate of the current scale of the pandemic. When you take a coronavirus test, you get a "yes" or "no" answer. There is no indication of how much virus was in the sample, or how likely it is to be an active infection. A person shedding a large amount of active virus, and a person with leftover fragments from an infection that's already been cleared, would receive the same - positive - test result.'
Flu virus has also magically vanished according to the WHO.
Covid must be is a genocidal maniac that respects some protests and not others, takes christmas holidays and ignores the flaws in the safety equipment that actually serves no purpose.
I dare anyone that says face masks work to run through a plague infected mass grave with just a mask/visor/scarf and prove me wrong..
@mr wpg - Yes the BBC! That one must have slipped through the net, as they are usually so hot on supressing anything that defies the Government narrative.
The PCR testing system is a giant scam. I could be wrong but I read that it was originally invented for the purpose of identifying cancerous cells (although not sure how many parts of the body it would reach going through the nose) which is why the sample gets magnified under a microscope more than 30 times. The test was never intended to identify virus levels. But that’s exactly why the government has used it for so long, so they can scare as many people as possible with fake case numbers. It’s a miracle that anyone taking a PCR test receives a negative result. Very noticeable that since mass testing has been introduced (especially in Liverpool) the ‘case’ numbers have significantly fallen over the last fortnight. Whatever test they’re using it’s obviously more accurate than Pillar 2, which isn’t difficult! I’m still baffled as to why healthy young, or middle aged, people would want to get tested though. They should all refuse it, unless they like the ridiculous idea of a freedom pass.
The Danish RCT results for face masks were released 10 days ago and not a peep from mainstream media, even the newspapers. The only outlets that i’ve heard it mentioned on are Talk Radio and various YouTube videos that don’t stay up for very long. In a rational world the results of a study like this should be headline news, especially since the last RCT was carried out in Vietnam in 2015, but apparently the MSM have decided that it never happened. Could it be because the trial results showed the inconvenient truth that face masks (especially the stupid blue cloth ones) are next to useless and may actually weaken people’s immune system. Alex Berenson also makes some interesting points about masks in his latest Covid chapter.
If the BBC or Sly News ever mention the Denmark study, even in passing, then I would probably pass out from the shock and then go and buy a big bottle of champagne to celebrate the rare event.
This is from the BBC of all people, and is a probable explanation for what you have just posted above. Your comments welcome as always.
'The main PCR test used to diagnose coronavirus is so sensitive it could be picking up fragments of dead virus from old infections, scientists say. Most people are infectious only for about a week, but could test positive weeks afterwards. Researchers say this could be leading to an over-estimate of the current scale of the pandemic. When you take a coronavirus test, you get a "yes" or "no" answer. There is no indication of how much virus was in the sample, or how likely it is to be an active infection. A person shedding a large amount of active virus, and a person with leftover fragments from an infection that's already been cleared, would receive the same - positive - test result.'