On my way home last Friday (21 May) I noticed people queuing for their jib-jab at a surgery close by so I decided to pop in and get a Patient Information Leaflet (PIL), copy attached.
Nobody in the queue had been given this document and the nurse at the top of the queue took a while to get me the leaflet which suggests that they had no intentions in providing it to those in the queue pre jabbing. They were already taking details from them though.
I did ask the nurse for more information regarding adverse effects and , in particular, risk of dying as a result of the vaccine, only to be told that I should go online and do the research. I did suggest that they, being administrators of the vaccine, would be better placed to at least provide me with a ballpark figure on the number of deaths etc. Another nurse responded saying it was miniscule, so I asked her to quantify “miniscule”. The same response “miniscule” was given.
Anyway, you will notice in PIL under “Risk of Vaccination” that there is no mention of “Death” in that column and yet “Death” appears in the other 2 columns. Hmmmm!
Mickey G - Good for you! They soon pull the old stunt that we saw in Nazi Germany, it didn't work then and it won't work now.
Hi @Divine Truth2 , As it happens, I went back only yesterday to "report" to them on my findings after "researching online" as they had "advised". The lady at reception was good enough to listen to my concerns about the adverse effects but said that the documents they hand out to patients had nothing to do with them and was the responsibility of PHE. I told her it ultimately became their responsibility as they were administering the vax and would be liable and needed to be informed of the damage they were doing to the public. I did compare it to being given guns by the PHE and told to shoot people. She actually listened and asked to keep a copy of PIL they had given me which I had photocopied with a summary of the yellow page serious adverse reactions on the back (attached) . She said she would be passing it on to the doctors.
Somebody posted this comment on another thread: Forced, coerced, and mandated vaccinations are in violation of the Nuremberg codes 1947, the Human rights act 1998, potentially the Equality Act 2010, Data protection act 2018, The Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984 specifically states that members of the public should not be compelled to undergo any mandatory medical treatment, including vaccinations. and ARTICLE 6 OF THE UNESCO 2005 STATEMENT ON BIOETHICS AND HUMAN RIGHTS
Article 6, section 1:
Any preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic medical intervention is only to be carried out with the prior, free and informed consent of the person concerned
Article 6, section 3:
In no case should a collective community agreement or the consent of a community leader or other authority substitute for an individual’s informed consent
Coronavirus Act 2020: Does it permit mandatory vaccinations?
“It is clear that mandatory medical treatment and vaccination are explicitly prohibited by the Act”. FRIDAY 1 MAY 2020
Louise Hooper Garden Court Chambers
No-one who has taken part in this whole scenario can escape prosecution, according to Reiner Fuellmich there is no immunity from international infliction of harm as it is intentional. He also says he will reveal where his proposed new court will operate from within the next few weeks. Watch his space>
Unfortunately, when the criminals happen to be at the NHS, we have to realize this is a serious situation. These medical staff have been placed for a purpose as with all Governments and their oppositions. They built up their plan over many years and there is only one way to fight against all of this sinister plan.
I remember doing trials a few years ago for new high blood pressure medication. I remember being given at least half a dozen sheets of the risks attached to the trials which were quite daunting and I nearly didn't do it, in the end I did and I feel I benefited. I also remember having a good chat with those who would be involved, a form to sign along with a doctors signature and copies retain on both sides. However! Gov. had no intention of given us any information because as we know now their plan was to have everyone take that jab as part of their mission of genocide, and joe public are rushing to oblige. Like Grumpy I also feel that we have to take a step back from those who want to walk the plank, we have no choice now.
MickeyG - If they put death in the 3rd column, then people might rightly hesitate in getting the jab. I should imagine that if somebody does die after having the jib- jab, it will be 'very' difficult to prove. Unless people start dying en-masse, then I'm sure a lot will sadly be put down as 'natural causes'. Unlike the Covid deaths, who actually died of natural causes, but were put down as having 'died testing positive within 28 days'. To be honest MickeyG, let those that want to take the 'snake oil' have it. What bothers me is the enforced restrictions on people like me who don't want it. And that's why I will be out there in London on the 29th protesting!