An update on the Petition to demand the Government go to a referendum before they consider signing away our sovereignty to the World Health Organisation, gifting them the power to choose if we; lockdown, social distance, wear masks, leave the house only if vaccinated etc ..., has been published.
A preference would be to have a public debate with experts from around the world who used the pre-covid pandemic model successfully, scientists who've saved lives and those who are fighting with all of us to shed light on the fraud and corrupt behaviours of those who have profited from the panic.
The first comment on the Govt in response to the public petition is disturbing enough, as they act as if everything is "kushty" (only fools and horses)
... as if anything they did this time actually worked!
To protect lives, the economy and future generations from future pandemics, the UK government supports a new legally-binding instrument to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.
So they are openly telling us that our MPs believe in the WHO as a governing body of wisdom and integrity, despite knowing the largest funders of this clearly infiltrated organisation, are the Chinese and profit driven known fraudulent, Pharmaceutical companies. The next paragraph is where it gets more sinister.
NOT FOR ME BUT FOR YOU ...
COVID-19 has demonstrated that no-one is safe until we are all safe, and that effective global cooperation is needed to better protect the UK and other countries around the world from the detrimental health, social and economic impacts of pandemics and other health threats. The UK supports a new international legally-binding instrument as part of a cooperative and comprehensive approach to pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.
Suggesting that 'no-one is safe unless everyone is safe'? Is nonsensical. It is anti-scientific pseudoscience. It denies that herd immunity is why humans are alive and thriving in 2022.
It is also a necessary psychological tool to ensure that people comply.
When you read that statement a few times, it is clear they are using the pain and suffering caused by lockdowns, social distancing, mask mandates as a threat to assert the fact a different approach (pharmaceutical) would avoid that suffering, so peer to peer pressure will be profound!
First and foremost, a full review of precisely what each country or state did or didn't do during the pandemic, is vital before anyone can determine which of the measures was effective or indeed if we should return to the pre-covid/ pre Gates interference pandemic plan, as Sweden successfully did. A review then of the advice given by the WHO, the evidence they used for their recommendations, the explanation for why they changed the definition of Natural Immunity, Herd Immunity and even Vaccination is important to understand what (or rather whom) influenced these actions during a pandemic.
It would be more than prudent for each citizen of our country to demand a full review by our elected officials before they bandy around any suggestion of a contract with a non-elected organisation.
And most definitely, we must assert loudly, we will never accept a LEGALLY BOUND agreement of any kind!
What Keep Britain Free believe ...
In order for anything these naive (or willfully ignorant) MPs suggest to be true or helpful, there would need to be significant obvious evidence that the management of the last pandemic went well!
Instead there is mounting evidence of years of life lost that will most certainly have exceeded the years of life lost to this so called 'novel' virus.
There is a great deal of mistrust, speculation and calling it out amongst the scientific and medical communities of the world. At great cost to their reputations and prospects. There are politicians who are equally concerned and will not be deterred from speaking out and demanding answers.
The World Health Organisation has lost all credibility. Let’s be honest: is there anyone out there who has faith in the ability of the World Health Organisation (WHO) to tackle a future pandemic? Any lingering hope that the WHO might be an organisation fit to be trusted with global heath concerns has pretty well evaporated with the election, by acclamation, of China as one of the 12 members of its executive board on Friday.
Ross Clarke: Spectator
Our minds just go to what's happening in Shanhai and we wonder how our MPs will explain the fact they are keen for the same barbaric inhumane leaders to have any influence over pandemic measures in our country!
James Roguski has published a substack suggesting that the meeting of the WHO 16.2 Int'l Health Regulation Amendments, reveals a win.
We've looked at his page, the official video of the committee agreement and are wondering what you think? We aren't familiar with James so cannot judge the quality of his assertions so will allow the content on his site, along with his summary to provide the information for your own evaluation.
Here is a brief summary of what happened:
Spectacular news out of Geneva points to a complete and total victory for those who opposed the amendments to the International Health Regulations proposed by the Biden administration
Official delegates from wealthy developed nations like Australia, the UK, the European Union and the United States spoke in strong support of the amendments and urged other states to join them in signing away their countries’ sovereignty.
The first sign, however, that things might not be going the globalists' way, came when Botswana stated that they would be collectively withholding their support for the ‘reforms’, which many African members were very concerned about.
Multiple other countries also said they had reservations over the changes and would not be supporting them either.
These included Brazil, Brunei, Namibia, Bangladesh, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and Iran. Brazil in particular said it would exit WHO altogether, rather than allow its population to be made subject to the new amendments.
In the end, the WHO and its wealthy nation supporters were forced to back down.
Clearly there was some resistance yet even so, there is much more work on our part to be done. It would actually be a positive action for any of the global movements to take control of a large campaign to enlighten the public of these proposals and Keep Watch of what's happening in each country, the WHO and every other connected faction.
We believe that the World Council for Health is doing so and we will do everything we can to support them.
The actual decisions for the handing over of our autonomy to a NGO that made vast mistakes in this pandemic and changed the rules, rewrote history, flip flopped on multiple new guidance, won't happen until 2024.
We will continue to keep watch and invite our members to put themselves forward as a 'rep' for 'watching' what's happening.
We would like to take this opportunity to invite members to volunteer to 'watch' this and other narratives as they unfold, both in our country and beyond.
If you're a keen researcher and able to keep notes, write articles, add citations to support your findings, please do get in touch.
And so to the vaccine ...
You may wonder how these two subjects are entwined.
The WHO taking control of our lives, bodies, choices is a very dangerous thing. As we have witnessed in countries (plenty still at it), who sacked Teachers, Doctors, Nurses, Care Workers and then ... every other employee who refused to risk their health, medical interventions have been 'politicised'.
The idea the 'captured' WHO could have full control of what happens to our bodies, fills many with terror. We know given Big Pharma is proven guilty of massive fraud (to the tune of billions in fines), death, injury and more.
Yet they fund the WHO and it's as if the world is in a trance, they cannot or will not see the glaringly obvious conflicts!
They fund many other official 'health' organisations. They even fund NHS Medical Doctors training and their ongoing literature to 'study'. They fund many charities set up to find 'cures' for illnesses and disease. And they profit from the same.
Influence. Many in the movements for freedom and autonomy, also feel there is little doubt the pharmaceuticals already have a huge influence over WHO. They therefore will use that influence (along with China), to ensure they can profit from future pandemics with a constant supply of never ending jabs! From cradle to grave, the nemesis that is that profit making beast, has no respect for human life, wellness or health.
Some MPs are waking up ...
If you already know of the safety concerns of the experimental treatment, then you'll possibly know of the work of the courageous Sir Christopher Chope MP?
KBF Members, like many members of our own families, believed the media and scientific experts when they said "this is our way out of this".
Far too many have been coerced by their employers, the media and even family, to accept the injection as if safety, successful prevention of infection, or worsening symptoms were an absolute guarantee.
We've all witnessed it's unravelling. It 'should' be humiliating and embarrassing to the officials who insisted it was 'safe and effective' on repeat.
Every journalist who attacked those who opted for natural immunity, should be apologising for their aggressive stance. (Andrew Neil, Hilary Jones et al)
Instead they ignore all the facts and continue to insist it has reduced hospitalisations or deaths. When the opposite is often seen by analysts when carefully observing the data.
The biggest concern with these rushed experimental vaccines, is the fact there is so much denial surrounding their failure to stand up to the media claims, covering up of the harms, NHS ignoring harms and a clear refusal to report those by medical Doctors.
That Pfizer expected to be permitted to keep their findings secret for 75 years, should alert even the most ardent vaccine supporter to wonder what they need to hide? (Carole Malone?)
Sir Christopher has come to the aid of his own constituents who have reported their serious side effects, some debilitating and the loss of their loved ones. Since going public with his demand that the Govt take seriously those vaccine injured, those who have died and their families ... the people have flocked to him for help.
We have been communicating with Sir Christopher since the outset and have offered support in his team's analysis of the reports. They have been swamped with desperate people's pleas for help, acknowledgement and compensation.
Though compensation is irrelevant when the impact of these harms is unquantifiable in monetary terms.
We have reports in our NHS Survey from our own KBF members of vaccine injuries, coercion and abuse of those who abstained.
Some truth tellers in the media
Obviously our own new media channels are filled with the brave, the truthful, the honest and the 'dynamic' investigators. It's rare as hens teeth however, to hear a journalist covering anything negative about these jabs on legacy media.
Mark Steyn has bravely been putting his own journalistic head above the parapet, doing his own analysis, interviewing real people who have and are suffering.
Here he challenges the latest efforts by media to minimise Sir Christopher's work by suggesting a 'numbers analyst' (fact checking lemming) is more correct than he.
Sir Christophers response to the fact checkers ...
Sir Christophers progress ...
Whilst Sir Christopher has suffered enormous shock and frustrations at the refusal of his peers to take seriously the needs of their constituents (an empty chamber when he spoke!), he has forged on.
Here is his latest email update:
Thank you for writing to me about my work concerning adverse effects following a Covid-19 vaccination. I set out the latest updates below.
In response to my Adjournment Debate concerning the Vaccine Damage Payments Act 1979 in early March, the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, Sajid Javid, met with me and Jeremy Wright MP, and subsequently wrote to me on these issues. Unfortunately, the Minister did not provide much detail about his proposals for reform of the existing Vaccine Damage Payments Scheme. He did, however, accept that there is a “growing international body of evidence supporting an association or link between the vaccines and certain adverse events” and that this “means NHSBSA [NHS Business Services Authority] is now in a position to begin the evidence gathering process on the VDPS COVID-19 claims”.
I also recently met with the Minister for Vaccines and Public Health, Maggie Throup, who confirmed that, despite the delay in processing claims under the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme, the first assessments of the c. 1,300 outstanding claims are now underway. This indicates some progress is being made.
It is also positive that, following a public consultation in which I submitted representations on this issue, the Covid-19 Public Inquiry Terms of Reference have recently been revised to include consideration of adverse reactions and side-effects to Covid-19 vaccines together with the adequacy of the current compensation arrangements. The revised Terms of Reference are available here.
In the previous Parliamentary session, alongside my above Adjournment Debate, I sought to introduce a Bill to place a duty on the Secretary of State to improve the diagnosis of Covid-19 vaccine harm, improve financial assistance for those affected, and report to Parliament on the eligibility criteria. A copy of what I said in support is here.
In this new session, I intend to build on this work by seeking to present further Private Members’ Bills on this issue, encouraging others to do so, and continuing to raise Parliamentary Questions seeking full and open information from the Government. On 12 May 2022, I raised the issue in my comments on the Queen’s Speechand referred to my recent article which provides further details, available here.
Many concerned members of the public who are taking an active interest in this issue are not my constituents. If you are in this category, please ensure that you put pressure on your own MP to become involved.
For those of you who have contacted me with your own personal experience of harm or bereavement following a Covid-19 vaccination, please accept my utmost sympathy. Many of you have contacted me to thank me for my work, or to pass on relevant information to me. Thank you also very much for this correspondence. Owing to the sheer quantity of messages I have received on this issue, I am unfortunately unable to respond individually but either I or, if appropriate, my office reviews each message I receive.
I much appreciate your continuing encouragement and support.
With best wishes
Sir Christopher Chope OBE MP
House of Commons, London SW1A 0AA
Research suggests mRNA all-cause mortality rate is higher: Professor Christine Stabell Benn explains
There are strong powers out there that don't want you to know about these results [...] Big pharma and the big public health institutions.
We could fill books with the number of videos, posts and investigative journals that cover the harmful effects, potential causes, undisclosed ingredients and hopeful cures of those harms relating to these experimental injections ... but we know many already catch those as they spread their wings in the movement channels.
The expectation is that the majority of public will continue to accept the 'offer' of the third, fourth, fifth and on and on jabs.
Yet the data shows that over 18 Million UK citizens refused any experimental jabs, millions refused jab number two and now we have over 30 Million refusing to participate any further.
Thats nearly half the population on the same page. We may not yet know what turned them off but let's keep in mind the media wanted us to believe there was only ever 5 Million who chose to trust their natural immunity.
Sadly the over 70s are still at risk of continued coercion despite continued media nudges of evidence to show that the bodies overall immunity to all infections or diseases is reducing in line with every jab.
Call to action ...
There is a new petition that is getting close the 100,000 signatures needed to force a debate in parliament.
Whatever your beliefs about the vaccines (experimental injections), your signature counts. Whatever your feelings around our ability to fight back, we feel quite strongly we have already proven that people's voices matter. We are not Canada. We never were Australia. But we got close. We fought back and we used every tool available to our citizenry to do so.
Petitions matter because Politicians are governed by their ego. And their ego doesn't like the idea they might be vilified for ignoring something that is significantly important.
For that reason we ask you to 'amplify' the work of Sir Christopher Chope, the journalism of Mark Steyn of GB News and every media story that highlights the danger of these experimental injections.