top of page

UPDATES; WHO & the Magical Mystery Vaccine

An update on the Petition to demand the Government go to a referendum before they consider signing away our sovereignty to the World Health Organisation, gifting them the power to choose if we; lockdown, social distance, wear masks, leave the house only if vaccinated etc ..., has been published.

A preference would be to have a public debate with experts from around the world who used the pre-covid pandemic model successfully, scientists who've saved lives and those who are fighting with all of us to shed light on the fraud and corrupt behaviours of those who have profited from the panic.

The first comment on the Govt in response to the public petition is disturbing enough, as they act as if everything is "kushty" (only fools and horses)

... as if anything they did this time actually worked!

To protect lives, the economy and future generations from future pandemics, the UK government supports a new legally-binding instrument to strengthen pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.

So they are openly telling us that our MPs believe in the WHO as a governing body of wisdom and integrity, despite knowing the largest funders of this clearly infiltrated organisation, are the Chinese and profit driven known fraudulent, Pharmaceutical companies. The next paragraph is where it gets more sinister.


COVID-19 has demonstrated that no-one is safe until we are all safe, and that effective global cooperation is needed to better protect the UK and other countries around the world from the detrimental health, social and economic impacts of pandemics and other health threats. The UK supports a new international legally-binding instrument as part of a cooperative and comprehensive approach to pandemic prevention, preparedness and response.

Suggesting that 'no-one is safe unless everyone is safe'? Is nonsensical. It is anti-scientific pseudoscience. It denies that herd immunity is why humans are alive and thriving in 2022.

It is also a necessary psychological tool to ensure that people comply.

When you read that statement a few times, it is clear they are using the pain and suffering caused by lockdowns, social distancing, mask mandates as a threat to assert the fact a different approach (pharmaceutical) would avoid that suffering, so peer to peer pressure will be profound!

First and foremost, a full review of precisely what each country or state did or didn't do during the pandemic, is vital before anyone can determine which of the measures was effective or indeed if we should return to the pre-covid/ pre Gates interference pandemic plan, as Sweden successfully did. A review then of the advice given by the WHO, the evidence they used for their recommendations, the explanation for why they changed the definition of Natural Immunity, Herd Immunity and even Vaccination is important to understand what (or rather whom) influenced these actions during a pandemic.

It would be more than prudent for each citizen of our country to demand a full review by our elected officials before they bandy around any suggestion of a contract with a non-elected organisation.

And most definitely, we must assert loudly, we will never accept a LEGALLY BOUND agreement of any kind!

What Keep Britain Free believe ...

In order for anything these naive (or willfully ignorant) MPs suggest to be true or helpful, there would need to be significant obvious evidence that the management of the last pandemic went well!

Instead there is mounting evidence of years of life lost that will most certainly have exceeded the years of life lost to this so called 'novel' virus.

There is a great deal of mistrust, speculation and calling it out amongst the scientific and medical communities of the world. At great cost to their reputations and prospects. There are politicians who are equally concerned and will not be deterred from speaking out and demanding answers.

The World Health Organisation has lost all credibility. Let’s be honest: is there anyone out there who has faith in the ability of the World Health Organisation (WHO) to tackle a future pandemic? Any lingering hope that the WHO might be an organisation fit to be trusted with global heath concerns has pretty well evaporated with the election, by acclamation, of China as one of the 12 members of its executive board on Friday.

Ross Clarke: Spectator

Our minds just go to what's happening in Shanhai and we wonder how our MPs will explain the fact they are keen for the same barbaric inhumane leaders to have any influence over pandemic measures in our country!

We won?

James Roguski has published a substack suggesting that the meeting of the WHO 16.2 Int'l Health Regulation Amendments, reveals a win.

We've looked at his page, the official video of the committee agreement and are wondering what you think? We aren't familiar with James so cannot judge the quality of his assertions so will allow the content on his site, along with his summary to provide the information for your own evaluation.

Here is a brief summary of what happened:
Spectacular news out of Geneva points to a complete and total victory for those who opposed the amendments to the International Health Regulations proposed by the Biden administration
Official delegates from wealthy developed nations like Australia, the UK, the European Union and the United States spoke in strong support of the amendments and urged other states to join them in signing away their countries’ sovereignty.
The first sign, however, that things might not be going the globalists' way, came when Botswana stated that they would be collectively withholding their support for the ‘reforms’, which many African members were very concerned about.
Multiple other countries also said they had reservations over the changes and would not be supporting them either.
These included Brazil, Brunei, Namibia, Bangladesh, Russia, India, China, South Africa, and Iran. Brazil in particular said it would exit WHO altogether, rather than allow its population to be made subject to the new amendments.
In the end, the WHO and its wealthy nation supporters were forced to back down.

Clearly there was some resistance yet even so, there is much more work on our part to be done. It would actually be a positive action for any of the global movements to take control of a large campaign to enlighten the public of these proposals and Keep Watch of what's happening in each country, the WHO and every other connected faction.

We believe that the World Council for Health is doing so and we will do everything we can to support them.

The actual decisions for the handing over of our autonomy to a NGO that made vast mistakes in this pandemic and changed the rules, rewrote history, flip flopped on multiple new guidance, won't happen until 2024.

We will continue to keep watch and invite our members to put themselves forward as a 'rep' for 'watching' what's happening.

We would like to take this opportunity to invite members to volunteer to 'watch' this and other narratives as they unfold, both in our country and beyond.